The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Density Functional Theory Study of Iron and Cobalt Carbides for Fischer−Tropsch Synthesis
Abstract
Carbides are important phases in heterogeneous catalysis. However, the understanding of carbide phases is inadequate: Fe and Co are the two commercial catalysts for Fischer−Tropsch (FT) synthesis, and experimental work showed that Fe carbide is the active phase in FT synthesis, whereas the appearance of Co carbide is considered as a possible deactivation cause. To understand very different catalytic roles of carbides, all the key elementary steps in FT synthesis, that is, CO dissociation, C 1 hydrogenation, and C 1 +C 1 coupling, are extensively investigated on both carbide surfaces using first principles calculations. In particular, the most important issues in FT synthesis, the activity and methane selectivity, on the carbide surfaces are quantitatively determined and analyzed. They are also discussed together with metallic Fe and Co surfaces. It is found that (i) Fe carbide is more active than metallic Fe and has similar methane selectivity to Fe, being consistent with the experiments; and (ii) Co carbide is less active than Co and has higher methane selectivity, providing evidence on the molecular level to support the suggestion that the formation of Co carbide is a cause of relatively high methane selectivity and deactivation on Co catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950-2000
Dry, M. E. (2002) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/s0920-5861(01)00453-9 · Cited by 2,061
Cited by
Cobalt carbide nanoprisms for direct production of lower olefins from syngas
Zhong, L., Yu, F., An, Y., Zhao, Y., Sun, Y., Li, Z., Lin, T., Lin, Y., Qi, X., Dai, Y., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19786 · Cited by 874
Status and prospects in higher alcohols synthesis from syngas
Luk, H. T., Mondelli, C., Ferré, D. C., Stewart, J. A., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00324a · Cited by 745
Significant Advances in C1 Catalysis: Highly Efficient Catalysts and Catalytic Reactions
Bao, J., Yang, G., Yoneyama, Y., & Tsubaki, N. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b03924 · Cited by 367
Jamaati, M., Torkashvand, M., Sarabadani Tafreshi, S., & de Leeuw, N. H. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28186525 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, J., Hu, P., Ellis, P., French, S., Kelly, G., & Lok, C. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-12-18
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1085-1093
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2031860558
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.