The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Salting-In/Salting-Out Ions be Classified as Chaotropes/Kosmotropes?
Abstract
Attempts to understand the Hofmeister Series at the molecular level has yielded numerous hypotheses, many of which refer to the way different salts modify the structural and dynamical properties of water. The most famous, and at the same time the most controversial, is the classification of cosolutes and ions as structure-breakers (chaotropes) or structure-makers (kosmotropes), and their identification as salting-in and salting-out agents, respectively. In this paper, we present results from molecular dynamics simulations correlating the ion-induced changes of the structural and dynamical properties of water and the ability of these ions to alter the magnitude of the hydrophobic interaction. Although most of the properties of water in the salt solutions change monotonically with the ability of the salt to increase/decrease the hydrophobic interaction, none of them is able to predict the transition from salting-in to salting-out, a prediction that was observed by the preferential binding/exclusion analysis. In addition, we find that the use of the terms, kosmotropes and chaotropes, is very misleading since the so-called kosmotropes can actually reduce the structure of water, whereas, the so-called chaotropes can increase the structure of water. Specifically, we find that the ability of the ions to reduce the hydrophobic interaction (a property attributed to chaotropes), correlates with their ability to increase the structure between the water molecules, including the number and strength of hydrogen bonds, and as a consequence, the water-water interaction energy (features attributed to kosmotropes). Nevertheless, the viscosity (as well as the rotational decay rate) of the water molecules decreases (increases) due to weaker binding to the ions. Thus, it is not the ion-induced structural ordering between the water molecules that affect the dynamical properties of water, but the strength of the ion-water interaction. Our results indicate that attempts to understand and predict salt-induced modulation of hydrophobic interactions only through the binary, salt-water, system is not possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Water as an active constituent in cell biology
Ball, P. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068037a · Cited by 2,177
COLLINS, K. (2004) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.03.021 · Cited by 1,091
How Ions Affect the Structure of Water
Hribar, B., Southall, N. T., Vlachy, V., & Dill, K. A. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026014h · Cited by 860
Cited by
Water structure and chaotropicity: their uses, abuses and biological implications
Ball, P., & Hallsworth, J. E. (2015) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c4cp04564e · Cited by 261
Cubillos, C. F., Aguilar, P., Grágeda, M., & Dorador, C. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2018jg004621 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Zangi, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-12-08
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 643-650
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2061992117
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.