The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of the Quantum Yield for the Photochemical Generation of Hydroxyl Radicals in TiO2Suspensions
Abstract
The generation of hydroxyl ( • OH) radicals plays a key role in the heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous suspensions of TiO 2 . The quantum yield of this process is thus an important parameter; however, it is not easy to measure in a particulate system arising from problems caused by light scattering from the particles. In this work, a reliable method for the determination of the quantum yield of hydroxyl radical production in heterogeneous systems has been developed, based on measurements of • OH radical generation rates and the photon flux absorbed by TiO 2 suspensions. In this procedure, a modified integrating sphere method was used to determine the true fraction of light absorbed by TiO 2 suspensions. A ferrioxalate chemical actinometer was used to measure the incident photon flux. As a check on the quantum yield method, good agreement with known literature values was obtained for quantum yield measurements of the photochemical generation of the p -benzosemiquinone (BQ •- ) radical in the photolysis of p -benzoquinone and of the • OH radical generation in the photolysis of hydrogen peroxide, respectively. Accordingly, the quantum yield for the • OH radical production in the TiO 2 suspension was determined to be 0.040 ± 0.003 at pH 7. Effects on the quantum yield of suspension loading, photon flux, and electron-acceptor addition (H 2 O 2 and O 2 ) were explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Explaining the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Degussa P25 Mixed-Phase TiO 2 Using EPR
Hurum, D. C., Agrios, A. G., Gray, K. A., Rajh, T., & Thurnauer, M. C. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0273934 · Cited by 2,015
Charge Carrier Dynamics at TiO2 Particles: Reactivity of Free and Trapped Holes
Bahnemann, D. W., Hilgendorff, M., & Memming, R. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp9639915 · Cited by 490
Chen, Y., Yang, S., Wang, K., & Lou, L. (2005) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.11.006 · Cited by 466
Yun, E.-T., Yoo, H.-Y., Bae, H., Kim, H.-I., & Lee, J. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b02519 · Cited by 359
Majumder, A., Gupta, B., & Gupta, A. K. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.108542 · Cited by 298
Mori, A., Yamashita, K., Tabata, Y., Seto, K., & Tokunaga, E. (2021) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/5.0066412 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, L., & Bolton, J. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4127-4134
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W2013294359
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.