The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intermolecular Nonbonded Contact Distances in Organic Crystal Structures: Comparison with Distances Expected from van der Waals Radii
Abstract
The conclusions derived from systematic analyses of intermolecular contact distances in organic crystals may be affected by the values assumed for van der Waals radii. The most widely used tabulations of van der Waals radii date back 30 years or more. Moreover, many of the tabulated values were chosen to reproduce volumes, not contact distances in crystals. Literally millions of nonbonded contact distances have been characterized by crystallography since the tabulations were compiled. A study has therefore been performed to establish the degree of consistency between these accumulated crystallographic data and the van der Waals radii of the common nonmetallic elements, as compiled by Pauling and Bondi. For halogens and sulfur, the results show a remarkable agreement between observed contact distances and the Bondi radii. Agreement is slightly less good for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, but discrepancies are still only about 0.05 Å. However, there is a significant difference for hydrogen, where the Bondi value of 1.2 Å is probably too high by about 0.1 Å.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models
Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B., & Cammi, R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9904009 · Cited by 16,868
SambVca 2. A Web Tool for Analyzing Catalytic Pockets with Topographic Steric Maps
Falivene, L., Credendino, R., Poater, A., Petta, A., Serra, L., Oliva, R., Scarano, V., & Cavallo, L. (2016) · Organometallics · doi:10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00371 · Cited by 907
The Bright Future of Unconventional σ/π‐Hole Interactions
Bauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J., & Frontera, A. (2015) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201500314 · Cited by 710
A new test set for validating predictions of protein–ligand interaction
Nissink, J. W. M., Murray, C., Hartshorn, M., Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., & Taylor, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10232 · Cited by 425
Self-citationPeluso, P., & Chankvetadze, B. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00846 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Rowland, R. S., & Taylor, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7384-7391
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W2061776255
- Cited by
- 1,473
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intermolecular Nonbonded Contact Distances in Organic Crystal Structures: Comparison with Distances Expected from van der Waals Radii. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp953141+
- The paper
- Rowland, R. S., & Taylor, R. (1996). Intermolecular Nonbonded Contact Distances in Organic Crystal Structures: Comparison with Distances Expected from van der Waals Radii. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp953141%2B
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.