The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Electrostatic Force Truncation on Interfacial and Transport Properties of Water
Abstract
The importance of accurately accounting for all Coulombic forces in molecular dynamics simulations of water at interfaces is demonstrated by comparing the Ewald summation technique with various spherical truncation methods. The increased structure induced by truncation methods at 12 Å leads to water/vapor surface tensions and surface potentials that are respectively 50% and 100% greater than obtained with Ewald. The orientational polarization of water at the lipid/water interface is analyzed within the Marcelja−Radic theory of the hydration force, yielding decay parameters of 2.6 and 1.8 Å for spherical truncation and Ewald, respectively, as compared with 1.7−2.1 Å obtained from experiment. Bulk water transport properties such as the viscosity and diffusion constants differ by as much as 100% between simulations carried out with and without truncation; this may be related to ordering in the neighborhood of the cutoff radius. The diffusion constant calculated from the Ewald simulation is significantly further from experiment than the cutoff result, pointing out the need to reparametrize the TIP3P water model for use with Ewald summation. Appendices describe a method for carrying out the Ewald summation on a distributed memory parallel computer and other computational details relevant when simulating large systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Hydration forces between phospholipid bilayers
Rand, R. P., & Parsegian, V. A. (1989) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/0304-4157(89)90010-5 · Cited by 1,125
Cited by
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
A simple polarizable model of water based on classical Drude oscillators
Lamoureux, G., MacKerell, A. D., & Roux, B. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1598191 · Cited by 688
Levitt, M., Hirshberg, M., Sharon, R., Laidig, K. E., & Daggett, V. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp964020s · Cited by 561
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Membrane Permeability
Venable, R. M., Krämer, A., & Pastor, R. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00486 · Cited by 394
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Feller, S. E., Pastor, R. W., Rojnuckarin, A., Bogusz, S., & Brooks, B. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 17011-17020
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W1985307198
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.