The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of Double-Layer Forces at the Electrode/Electrolyte Interface Using the Atomic Force Microscope: Potential and Anion Dependent Interactions
Abstract
The forces between a silica probe and silica and gold substrates were measured with an atomic force microscope in the presence of a series of alkali-halide electrolyte solutions. The interaction between two silica surfaces was repulsive and could be accurately predicted by Derjaguin−Landau−Verwey−Overbeek theory. The silica surface was negatively charged at a pH of 5.5 and the effective surface potential increased in magnitude with decreasing electrolyte concentration. In contrast, the force between the silica probe and a gold substrate was attractive at open circuit. This interaction was a strong function of the potential applied to the gold and the nature of the electrolyte species. In general, the silica−gold interaction changed from attractive, when the gold was held at positive potentials, to repulsive at negative potentials. A series of force measurements as a function of the potential of the gold electrode indicated that the repulsive force increased when moving toward more negative potentials, corresponding to the removal of adsorbed anions. The potential at which the silica−gold interaction passed through a minimum, referred to as the potential of zero force (pzf), corresponded closely to the potential of zero charge (pzc) in these systems. The pzf values were compared to those determined from measurements of the electrode capacitance in 10 -3 M solutions of NaF, KCl, KBr, and KI. The force data were also compared to theoretical predictions of the forces between dissimilarly charged surfaces obtained by solving the complete nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann equation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Israelachvili, J. N., & Adams, G. E. (1978) · Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases · doi:10.1039/f19787400975 · Cited by 1,812
The drainage of thin liquid films between solid surfaces
Chan, D. Y. C., & Horn, R. G. (1985) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.449693 · Cited by 762
Cited by
Structure and Nanostructure in Ionic Liquids
Hayes, R., Warr, G. G., & Atkin, R. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500411q · Cited by 2,293
Spatially resolved force spectroscopy of biological surfaces using the atomic force microscope
Heinz, W. F., & Hoh, J. H. (1999) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(99)01304-9 · Cited by 373
Adhesive and Friction Forces between Chemically Modified Silicon and Silicon Nitride Surfaces
Tsukruk, V. V., & Bliznyuk, V. N. (1998) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la970367q · Cited by 318
Chemical and Biochemical Analysis Using Scanning Force Microscopy
Takano, H., Kenseth, J. R., Wong, S.-S., O'Brie, J. C., & Porter, M. D. (1999) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9801317 · Cited by 259
Interactions between Molecularly Smooth Gold and Mica Surfaces across Aqueous Solutions
Chai, L., & Klein, J. (2009) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la9014527 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Hillier, A. C., Kim, S., & Bard, A. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 18808-18817
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W2169814424
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.