The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ONIOM: A Multilayered Integrated MO + MM Method for Geometry Optimizations and Single Point Energy Predictions. A Test for Diels−Alder Reactions and Pt(P(t-Bu)3)2 + H2 Oxidative Addition
Abstract
The new ONIOM (our own n -layered integrated molecular orbital and molecular mechanics) approach has been proposed and shown to be successful in reproducing benchmark calculations and experimental results. ONIOM3, a three-layered version, divides a system into an active part treated at a very high level of ab initio molecular orbital theory like CCSD(T), a semiactive part that includes important electronic contributions and is treated at the HF or MP2 level, and a nonactive part that is handled using force field approaches. The three-layered scheme allows us to study a larger system more accurately than the previously proposed two-layered schemes IMOMO, which can treat a medium size system very accurately, and IMOMM, which can handle a very large system with modest accuracy. This three-layered scheme has been applied to activation barriers for the Diels−Alder reaction of acrolein + isoprene, acrolein + 2- tert -butyl-1,3-butadiene, and ethylene + 1,4-di- tert -butyl-1,3-butadiene. In general, the results for both geometry optimizations and single point energy calculations agree well with benchmark predictions and experimental results. The scheme has also been applied to the transition state for the oxidative addition of H 2 to Pt(P( t -Bu) 3 ) 2 . The activation energy of this 83-atom reaction is predicted to be 14.2 kcal/mol with the ONIOM3(CCSD(T):MP2:MM3) method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0940 · Cited by 14,314
Cited by
Cossi, M., Rega, N., Scalmani, G., & Barone, V. (2003) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10189 · Cited by 8,056
Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0
Neese, F. (2022) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1606 · Cited by 4,963
P450 Enzymes: Their Structure, Reactivity, and Selectivity—Modeled by QM/MM Calculations
Shaik, S., Cohen, S., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Kumar, D., & Thiel, W. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900121s · Cited by 1,083
Vreven, T., Morokuma, K., Farkas, Ö., Schlegel, H. B., & Frisch, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10156 · Cited by 608
Self-citationExtending the Power of Quantum Chemistry to Large Systems with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method
Fedorov, D. G., & Kitaura, K. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp0716740 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Svensson, M., Humbel, S., Froese, R. D. J., Matsubara, T., Sieber, S., & Morokuma, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 19357-19363
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W1968344479
- Cited by
- 1,977
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.