Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of the Pre-Treatment of Carbon Black Supports on the Activity of Fe-Based Electrocatalysts for the Reduction of Oxygen

Wang, H., Côté,, R., Faubert, G., Guay, D., Dodelet, J. P.·1999·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

A method involving HNO 3 /NH 3 treatments of a carbon support (Vulcan XC-72R), addition of Fe from inorganic precursors, and a thermal treatment at 900 °C under an inert atmosphere for the preparation of Fe-based oxygen reduction electrocatalysts for use in polymer electrolyte fuel cells has been investigated. The prepared materials were evaluated in acidic medium by the rotating disk electrode technique using the potential at the oxygen reduction peak, E p, as a measure of the electrocatalytic activity. Two sets of experiments were performed: (i) varying the conditions of the HNO 3 /NH 3 treatments of Vulcan XC-72R, and (ii) varying Fe loadings added to the HNO 3 /NH 3 pretreated C samples. In the first set of experiments, no Fe was adsorbed on the C support. It was shown that a combined HNO 3 and NH 3 treatment of the carbon support gave higher activity for oxygen reduction than either HNO 3 or NH 3 treatment alone. In the second set of experiments, it was shown that the activity of the HNO 3 /NH 3 -modified C support increases steadily as the iron content is increased from 10 to about 1000 ppm. Above that Fe content, the activity of the materials first levels off and then decreases for even larger Fe concentrations. The value of E p at saturation increases with the total N surface content of HNO 3 /NH 3 -pretreated C support. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals that at maximal electrochemical activity, there is only 1 Fe atom per 100 N atoms at the surface of the carbon support. For larger Fe contents another mechanism, i.e., the aggregation of small iron-containing particles, probably accounts for all additional Fe ions adsorbed on the modified carbon black during the preparation procedure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp9821735

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H., Côté, Faubert, G., Guay, D., & Dodelet, J. P.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
103
Issue
12
Pages
2042-2049
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W1977117610
Cited by
197
References
1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.