The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spray-Drying of Air–Liquid Interface Sensitive Recombinant Human Growth Hormone
Abstract
Spray-drying is an attractive method for preparing fine recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) powders if the detrimental effect of protein degradation at the air-liquid interface on the protein can be minimized. In this study, we demonstrated that rhGH degradation (insoluble and soluble aggregate formation), as the consequence of air-liquid interfacial degradation, could be prevented using the appropriate formulation. Adding polysorbate-20 surfactant into the liquid feed (with no presence of sugar protectant) significantly reduced the formation of insoluble protein aggregates, while adding the divalent metal zinc ion effectively suppressed the formation of soluble protein aggregates. The combination of the two yielded a spray-dried rhGH powder having insignificant protein degradation. Our data suggest that the two components might protect the protein through different mechanisms. Polysorbate molecules occupy the air-liquid interface of spray droplets, thereby reducing the chance for rhGH to form insoluble aggregates by surface denaturation. Two zinc ions associate with two rhGH molecules to form a dimer complex that can resist the formation of soluble protein aggregates. Characterization of spray-dried powders by scanning electron microscopy suggests that both formulation and drying conditions have a strong influence on particle morphology and shape. Overall, spherical rhGH powders of smooth surface and good biochemical quality can be prepared by spray-drying using this formulation with no addition of sugar protectant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interactions of formulation excipients with proteins in solution and in the dried state
Ohtake, S., Kita, Y., & Arakawa, T. (2011) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.06.011 · Cited by 398
Ziaee, A., Albadarin, A. B., Padrela, L., Femmer, T., O'Reilly, E., & Walker, G. (2019) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2018.10.026 · Cited by 366
Protein Inhalation Powders: Spray Drying vs Spray Freeze Drying
Maa, Y.-F., Nguyen, P.-A., Sweeney, T., Shire, S. J., & Hsu, C. C. (1999) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1018828425184 · Cited by 356
Self-citationFormulation and Physical Characterization of Large Porous Particles for Inhalation
Vanbever, R., Mintzes, J. D., Wang, J., Nice, J., Chen, D., Batycky, R., Langer, R., & Edwards, D. A. (1999) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1018910200420 · Cited by 314
Pulmonary delivery of growth hormone using dry powders and visualization of its local fate in rats
Bosquillon, C., Préat, V., & Vanbever, R. (2004) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.01.027 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Maa, Y.-F., Nguyen, P.-A. T., & Hsu, S. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-159
- ISSN
- 0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021054017
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.