Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanoporous Graphene Membranes for Efficient3He/4He Separation

Hauser, Andreas W., Schwerdtfeger, Peter·2012·The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Abstract

Nanoporous functionalized graphene membranes containing nitrogen atoms in a nanosized ring pore have the capability to separate 3 He from 4 He efficiently by quantum tunneling through the pore. Calculations on size-reduced model systems of single-graphene pores reveal that a balanced choice of tunneling barrier height and low gas temperature boosts the selectivity and keeps the helium gas flux at an industrially exploitable level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jz201504k

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Hauser, A. W., & Schwerdtfeger, P.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Published
2012-01-05
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
209-213
ISSN
1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2321545507
Cited by
166
References
2
FWCI
27.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoporous Graphene Membranes for Efficient3He/4He Separation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jz201504k
The paper
Hauser, A. W., & Schwerdtfeger, P. (2012). Nanoporous Graphene Membranes for Efficient3He/4He Separation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz201504k

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.