Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for the Mechanism of Photocatalytic Degradation of the Bacterial Wall Membrane at the TiO2 Interface by ATR-FTIR and Laser Kinetic Spectroscopy

Kiwi, J., Nadtochenko, V.·2005·Langmuir

Abstract

The photocatalytic peroxidation of E. coli cell, lipo-polysaccharide (LPS), phosphatidyl-ethanolcholine (PE), and peptidoglycan (PGN) of the E. coli membrane wall has been investigated on TiO2 porous films by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. The fast reactions of the photogenerated charge carriers in TiO2 with E. coli, LPS, and PE were monitored by laser kinetic spectroscopy. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy allowed the identification of E. coli, LPS, PE, and PGN as photocatalytic peroxidation products. The PGN was observed to be the most resistant membrane wall component. Shorter peroxidation times were observed for LPS and PE. Laser photolysis shows that E. coli, LPS, and PE compete in the scavenging of a surface trapped holes (h+) with the recombination reaction of h+ with the generated electrons (e-) within times > 50 ns. This scavenging leads to the formation of organic radicals initiating the radical chain peroxidation of E. coli, LPS, PE, and PE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la046983l

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Kiwi, J., & Nadtochenko, V.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2005-04-06
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
4631-4641
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2058150820
Cited by
318
References
24
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.