Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 721

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of Nanocrystal Sizes: A Comparison of TEM, SAXS, and XRD Studies of Highly Monodisperse CoPt3 Particles

Borchert, Holger, Shevchenko, Elena V., Robert, Aymeric, Mekis, Ivo, Kornowski, Andreas, Grübel, Gerhard, Weller, Horst·2005·Langmuir

Abstract

One of the most fundamental tasks in nanoscience is the accurate determination of particle sizes. Various methods have been developed to elucidate the mean particle diameter and the standard deviation for an ensemble of nanocrystals. However, good agreement between the results from different methods is not always encountered in the literature. In this study, we investigate colloidally prepared, highly monodisperse CoPt3 nanoparticles by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results are compared in order to examine to which extent agreement is obtained by the different techniques when applied to small nanocrystals in the size range below 10 nm. In particular, the applicability of the simple Scherrer formula for size determination from the broadening of XRD reflections is checked. When the different techniques are correctly applied, the results from all methods are in good agreement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la0477183

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 721

Metadata

Authors
Borchert, H., Shevchenko, E. V., Robert, A., Mekis, I., Kornowski, A., Grübel, G., & Weller, H.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2005-01-29
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
1931-1936
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2055264375
Cited by
721
References
14
FWCI
8.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.