The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wetting Phenomena at the CO2/Water/Glass Interface
Abstract
A novel high-pressure apparatus and technique were developed to measure CO2/water/solid contact angles (theta) in situ for pressures up to 204 bar. For two glass substrates with different hydrophilicities, theta increased significantly with CO2 pressure. As the pressure was increased, an increase in the cohesive energy density of CO2 caused the substrate/CO2 and water/CO2 interfacial tensions (gamma) to decrease, whereas the water/substrate gamma value increased. theta for the more hydrophobic substrate was predicted accurately from the experimental water/CO2 gamma value and an interfacial model that included only long-range forces. However, for the more hydrophilic substrate, short-range specific interactions due to capping of the silanol groups by physisorbed CO2 resulted in an unusually large increase in the water/substrate gamma value, which led to a much larger increase in theta than predicted by the model. A novel type of theta hysteresis was discovered in which larger theta values were observed during depressurization than during pressurization, even down to ambient pressure. Effective receding angles were observed upon pressurization, and effective advancing angles were observed upon depressurization on the basis of movement of the three-phase contact line. The greater degree of hysteresis for the more hydrophilic silica can be attributed in part to the capping of silanol groups with CO2. The large effects of CO2 on the various interfacial energies play a key role in the enhanced ability of CO2, relative to many organic solvents, to dry silica surfaces as reported previously on the basis of FTIR spectroscopy (Tripp, C. P.; Combes, J. R. Langmuir 1998, 14, 7348-7352).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CO2wettability of seal and reservoir rocks and the implications for carbon geo-sequestration
Iglauer, S., Pentland, C. H., & Busch, A. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr015553 · Cited by 639
Espinoza, D. N., & Santamarina, J. C. (2010) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2009wr008634 · Cited by 531
Wettability alteration of caprock minerals by carbon dioxide
CHIQUET, P., BROSETA, D., & THIBEAU, S. (2007) · Geofluids · doi:10.1111/j.1468-8123.2007.00168.x · Cited by 498
Synthesis of Metal Oxide Nanostructures by Direct Sol–Gel Chemistry in Supercritical Fluids
Sui, R., & Charpentier, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2000465 · Cited by 313
Iglauer, S., Mathew, M. S., & Bresme, F. (2012) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.052 · Cited by 289
The Nanoscale Basis of CO2 Trapping for Geologic Storage
Bourg, I. C., Beckingham, L. E., & DePaolo, D. J. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03003 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickson, J. L., Gupta, G., Horozov, T. S., Binks, B. P., & Johnston, K. P.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2161-2170
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2089071961
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.