The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Polymeric Nano/Microcapsules of Liquid Perfluorocarbons for Ultrasonic Imaging: Physical Characterization
Abstract
Ultrasonic imaging is a widely available, noninvasive, and cost-effective diagnostic modality, but vessels smaller than 200 mum in diameter are impossible to visualize. Commercial ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs), consisting of encapsulated gas microbubbles injected intravenously, enable only a qualitative visualization of the microvascularization for a short period of time since they are rather unstable. In a strategy to develop more stable UCAs, we designed a process to obtain nano/microcapsules with a single core of liquid perfluorocarbons within a biodegradable polymeric shell of homogeneous thickness. The polymer shell should improve the stability of the capsules as compared to UCAs stabilized by a monomolecular layer, while the acoustic impedance of the perfluorocarbons should ensure their echogenicity. These capsules have been optimized to encapsulate several liquid perfluorocarbons: perfluorohexane, perfluorodecalin, and perfluorooctyl bromide. The system is rather versatile: the mean size of the capsules can be adjusted between 70 nm and 25 microm and the thickness-to-radius ratio (T/R) can be easily modulated by simply modifying the polymer-to-perfluorocarbon ratio. T/R does not depend on the size of the capsules and is between 0.2 and 0.6. The dependence of the echogenic properties of the capsules with their size and their T/R has yet to be studied experimentally before this system can be evaluated in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polymeric Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery: Recent Developments and Future Prospects
Begines, B., Ortiz, T., Pérez-Aranda, M., Martínez, G., Merinero, M., Argüelles-Arias, F., & Alcudia, A. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10071403 · Cited by 1,061
Multimodality Imaging Probes: Design and Challenges
Louie, A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003538 · Cited by 1,044
Nanotheranostics for personalized medicine
Mura, S., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.006 · Cited by 527
Fluorine (19F) MRS and MRI in biomedicine
Ruiz‐Cabello, J., Barnett, B. P., Bottomley, P. A., & Bulte, J. W. M. (2011) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1570 · Cited by 489
Design of ultrasonically-activatable nanoparticles using low boiling point perfluorocarbons
Sheeran, P. S., Luois, S. H., Mullin, L. B., Matsunaga, T. O., & Dayton, P. A. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.021 · Cited by 254
Xu, J. S., Huang, J., Qin, R., Hinkle, G. H., Povoski, S. P., Martin, E. W., & Xu, R. X. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.052 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Pisani, E., Tsapis, N., Paris, J., Nicolas, V., Cattel, L., & Fattal, E.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-03-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4397-4402
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2089597688
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.