The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bridge-Bonded Formate: Active Intermediate or Spectator Species in Formic Acid Oxidation on a Pt Film Electrode?
Abstract
We present and discuss the results of an in situ IR study on the mechanism and kinetics of formic acid oxidation on a Pt film/Si electrode, performed in an attenuated total reflection (ATR) flow cell configuration under controlled mass transport conditions, which specifically aimed at elucidating the role of the adsorbed bridge-bonded formates in this reaction. Potentiodynamic measurements show a complex interplay between formation and desorption/oxidation of COad and formate species and the total Faradaic current. The notably faster increase of the Faradaic current compared to the coverage of bridge-bonded formate in transient measurements at constant potential, but with different formic acid concentrations, reveals that adsorbed formate decomposition is not rate-limiting in the dominant reaction pathway. If being reactive intermediate at all, the contribution of formate adsorption/decomposition to the reaction current decreases with increasing formic acid concentration, accounting for at most 15% for 0.2 M DCOOH at 0.7 VRHE. The rapid build-up/removal of the formate adlayer and its similarity with acetate or (bi-)sulfate adsorption/desorption indicate that the formate adlayer coverage is dominated by a fast dynamic adsorption-desorption equilibrium with the electrolyte, and that formate desorption is much faster than its decomposition. The results corroborate the proposal of a triple pathway reaction mechanism including an indirect pathway, a formate pathway, and a dominant direct pathway, as presented previously (Chen, Y. X.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 981), in which adsorbed formates act as a site-blocking spectator in the dominant pathway rather than as an active intermediate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Single-atom Rh/N-doped carbon electrocatalyst for formic acid oxidation
Xiong, Y., Dong, J., Huang, Z.-Q., Xin, P., Chen, W., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Jin, Z., Xing, W., Zhuang, Z., et al. (2020) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0665-x · Cited by 610
Neurock, M., Janik, M., & Wieckowski, A. (2009) · Faraday Discuss. · doi:10.1039/b804591g · Cited by 444
Chen, L., Guo, H., Fujita, T., Hirata, A., Zhang, W., Inoue, A., & Chen, M. (2011) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201101227 · Cited by 270
Importance of Acid–Base Equilibrium in Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Formic Acid on Platinum
Joo, J., Uchida, T., Cuesta, A., Koper, M. T. M., & Osawa, M. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja403578s · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-X., Heinen, M., Jusys, Z., & Behm, R. J.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-10-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 10399-10408
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2011338484
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridge-Bonded Formate: Active Intermediate or Spectator Species in Formic Acid Oxidation on a Pt Film Electrode? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la060928q
- The paper
- Chen, Y.-X., Heinen, M., Jusys, Z., & Behm, R. J. (2006). Bridge-Bonded Formate: Active Intermediate or Spectator Species in Formic Acid Oxidation on a Pt Film Electrode? Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la060928q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.