Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 539

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bipolar Electrochemical Mechanism for the Propulsion of Catalytic Nanomotors in Hydrogen Peroxide Solutions

Wang, Yang, Hernandez, Rose M., Bartlett, David J., Bingham, Julia M., Kline, Timothy R., Sen, Ayusman, Mallouk, Thomas E.·2006·Langmuir

Abstract

Bimetallic nanorods are propelled in aqueous solutions by the catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide to oxygen and water. Several mechanisms (interfacial tension gradients, bubble recoil, viscous Brownian ratchet, self-electrophoresis) have been proposed for the transduction of chemical to mechanical energy in this system. From Tafel plots of anodic and cathodic hydrogen peroxide reactions at various metal (Au, Pt, Rh, Ni, Ru, and Pd) ultramicroelectrodes, we determine the potential at which the anodic and cathodic reaction rates are equal for each metal. These measurements allow one to predict the direction of motion of all possible bimetallic combinations according to the bipolar electrochemical (or self-electrophoretic) mechanism. These predictions are consistent with the observed direction of motion in all cases studied, providing strong support for the mechanism. We also find that segmented nanorods with one Au end and one poly(pyrrole) end containing catalase, an enzyme that decomposes hydrogen peroxide nonelectrochemically, perform the overall catalytic reaction at a rate similar to that of nanorods containing Au and Pt segments. However, in this case there is no observed axial movement, again supporting the bipolar electrochemical propulsion mechanism for bimetallic nanorods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la0615950

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Hernandez, R. M., Bartlett, D. J., Bingham, J. M., Kline, T. R., Sen, A., & Mallouk, T. E.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2006-09-15
Volume
22
Issue
25
Pages
10451-10456
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2093932181
Cited by
539
References
0
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.