Diffusion on membrane tubes: a highly discriminatory test of the Saffman-Delbruck theory
Abstract
The efficient transport of membrane proteins is vital in maintaining life. In this work, we investigate the transport of such membrane proteins along long thin membrane tubes or tethers. We calculate the diffusion constant to leading order in the low Reynolds number regime to be D = (4 pi eta)-1 log(r/a), with r and a being the tube and protein radii, respectively, and eta being the membrane viscosity. Thus we propose an exact limiting form for the controversial logarithmic correction, such as originally introduced by Saffman and Delbruck, that involves the tube radius rather than some "frame size". Our work suggests a test of this logarithmic correction could be achieved by measuring diffusion on membrane tubes, exploiting the fact that the equilibrium tube radius can be controlled by the membrane tension and varied over several orders of magnitude. We analyze the time taken for a protein to transit a membrane tube between cells and find that this can vary by an order of magnitude over physiological tensions. This is a strong effect in biological terms and suggests a possible regulatory coupling between membrane tension and signaling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reducing the radius of a membrane tube reduced the mobility of both lipids and proteins with a factor of five compared to planar diffusion.
“Recent experimental studies on membrane tubes show that reducing the radius of a membrane tube, which sets the relevant length scale in the Saffman-Delbruck theory, indeed reduced the mobility of both lipids and proteins with a factor of five compared to planar diffusion (Daniels and Turner, 2007; Domanov et al., 2011).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Daniels and Turner, 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 58 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Daniels, D. R., & Turner, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-05-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6667-6670
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W1965293434
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Langmuir (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL058512, HL-58512)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Keywords
- membrane tubes, membrane tethers, membrane protein diffusion, logarithmic corrections, membrane viscosity, membrane tension, tube radius, membrane protein transport
- MeSH terms
- Diffusion, Membranes, Artificial, Models, Theoretical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review