The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probing Protein Adsorption onto Mercaptoundecanoic Acid Stabilized Gold Nanoparticles and Surfaces by Quartz Crystal Microbalance and ζ-Potential Measurements
Abstract
The adsorption characteristics of three proteins [bovine serum albumin (BSA), myoglobin (Mb), and cytochrome c (CytC)] onto self-assembled monolayers of mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) on both gold nanoparticles (AuNP) and gold surfaces (Au) are described. The combination of quartz crystal microbalance measurements with dissipation (QCM-D) and pH titrations of the zeta-potential provide information on layer structure, surface coverage, and potential. All three proteins formed adsorption layers consisting of an irreversibly adsorbed fraction and a reversibly adsorbed fraction. BSA showed the highest affinity for the MUA/Au, forming an irreversibly adsorbed rigid monolayer with a side-down orientation and packing close to that expected in the jamming limit. In addition, BSA showed a large change in the adsorbed mass due to reversibly bound protein. The data indicate that the irreversibly adsorbed fraction of CytC is a monolayer structure, whereas the irreversibly adsorbed Mb is present in form of a bilayer. The observation of stable BSA complexes on MUA/AuNPs at the isoelectric point by zeta-potential measurements demonstrates that BSA can sterically stabilize MUA/AuNP. On the other hand, MUA/AuNP coated with either Mb or CytC formed a reversible flocculated state at the isoelectric point. The colloidal stability differences may be correlated with weaker binding in the reversibly bound overlayer in the case of Mb and CytC as compared to BSA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wallace, J. M., Rice, J. K., Pietron, J. J., Stroud, R. M., Long, J. W., & Rolison, D. R. (2003) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl034646b · Cited by 85
Cited by
Aggarwal, P., Hall, J. B., McLeland, C. B., Dobrovolskaia, M. A., & McNeil, S. E. (2009) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.009 · Cited by 1,791
Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements
Her, S., Jaffray, D. A., & Allen, C. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.012 · Cited by 865
Jachimska, B., Wasilewska, M., & Adamczyk, Z. (2008) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la800548p · Cited by 377
Probing nanoparticle interactions in cell culture media
Sabuncu, A. C., Grubbs, J., Qian, S., Abdel-Fattah, T. M., Stacey, M. W., & Beskok, A. (2012) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.02.022 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaufman, E. D., Belyea, J., Johnson, M. C., Nicholson, Z. M., Ricks, J. L., Shah, P. K., Bayless, M., Pettersson, T., Feldotö, Z., Blomberg, E., Claesson, P., & Franzen, S.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-04-28
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6053-6062
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2023119820
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
