The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Humidity on the Performance of Microporous Coordination Polymers as Adsorbents for CO2 Capture
Abstract
The CO(2)-capture performance of microporous coordination polymers of the M/DOBDC series (where M = Zn, Ni, Co, and Mg; DOBDC = 2,5-dioxidobenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate) was evaluated under flow-through conditions with dry surrogate flue gas (5/1 N(2)/CO(2)). The CO(2) capacities were found to track with static CO(2) sorption capacities at room temperature, with Mg/DOBDC demonstrating an exceptional capacity for CO(2) (23.6 wt %). The effect of humidity on the performance of Mg/DOBDC was investigated by collecting N(2)/CO(2)/H(2)O breakthrough curves at relative humidities (RHs) in the feed of 9, 36, and 70%. After exposure at 70% RH and subsequent thermal regeneration, only about 16% of the initial CO(2) capacity of Mg/DOBDC was recovered. However, in the case of Ni/DOBDC and Co/DOBDC, approximately 60 and 85%, respectively, of the initial capacities were recovered after the same treatment. These data indicate that although Mg/DOBDC has the highest capacity for CO(2), under the conditions used in this study, Co/DOBDC may be a more desirable material for deployment in CO(2) capture systems because of the added costs associated with flue gas dehumidification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases
Britt, D., Tranchemontagne, D., & Yaghi, O. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804900105 · Cited by 958
Fang, Q.-R., Yuan, D.-Q., Sculley, J., Li, J.-R., Han, Z.-B., & Zhou, H.-C. (2010) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic101935f · Cited by 309
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Burtch, N. C., Jasuja, H., & Walton, K. S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5002589 · Cited by 2,730
Porous materials with optimal adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics for CO2 separation
Nugent, P., Belmabkhout, Y., Burd, S. D., Cairns, A. J., Luebke, R., Forrest, K., Pham, T., Ma, S., Space, B., Wojtas, L., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11893 · Cited by 2,387
The chemistry of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 capture, regeneration and conversion
Trickett, C. A., Helal, A., Al-Maythalony, B. A., Yamani, Z. H., Cordova, K. E., & Yaghi, O. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.45 · Cited by 1,524
CO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Metadata
- Authors
- Kizzie, A. C., Wong-Foy, A. G., & Matzger, A. J.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-04-13
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 6368-6373
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2325161613
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 63.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.