The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protein-Resistant Poly(ethylene oxide)-Grafted Surfaces: Chain Density-Dependent Multiple Mechanisms of Action
Abstract
A clear understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the protein-resistant nature of end-tethered poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) surfaces remains elusive. A barrier to improved understanding is the fact that many of the factors involved (chain length, chain density, hydration, conformation, and distal chemistry) are inherently correlated. We hypothesize that, by comparing systems of variable but precisely known chain density, it should be possible to gain additional insight into the effects of the other factors. To evaluate this hypothesis, chain-end-thiolated PEOs were chemisorbed to gold-coated silicon wafers such that a range of chain densities was obtained. Three different PEOs were investigated: hydroxy-terminated chains of molecular weight 600 (600-OH), methoxy-terminated chains of molecular weight 750 (750-OCH3), and methoxy-terminated chains of molecular weight 2000 (2000-OCH3). In situ null ellipsometry was used to determine PEO chemisorption kinetics, ultimate PEO chain densities, protein adsorption kinetics, and ultimate protein adsorbed quantities. With this approach, it was possible to ascertain the effects of PEO distal chemistry (-OH, -OCH3), chain length, and layer hydration on protein adsorption. The data obtained suggested that properties related to chain density (conformational freedom, hydration) were the main determinants of protein resistance at chain densities up to a critical value of approximately 0.5 chain/nm2; at this value, protein adsorption was a minimum for the methoxy-terminated PEOs. For the hydroxyl-terminated PEO, adsorption leveled off at the critical value. Thus distal chemistry appears to be a major determinant of protein resistance at chain densities greater than the critical value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery
Suk, J. S., Xu, Q., Kim, N., Hanes, J., & Ensign, L. M. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.09.012 · Cited by 4,523
Nanoparticle Size and Surface Chemistry Determine Serum Protein Adsorption and Macrophage Uptake
Walkey, C. D., Olsen, J. B., Guo, H., Emili, A., & Chan, W. C. W. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2084338 · Cited by 1,926
Walkey, C. D., & Chan, W. C. W. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15233e · Cited by 1,758
Stealth Properties to Improve Therapeutic Efficacy of Drug Nanocarriers
Salmaso, S., & Caliceti, P. (2013) · Journal of Drug Delivery · doi:10.1155/2013/374252 · Cited by 340
High-Q Optical Sensors for Chemical and Biological Analysis
Luchansky, M. S., & Bailey, R. C. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac2029024 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Unsworth, L. D., Sheardown, H., & Brash, J. L.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-01-25
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1924-1929
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W1986690534
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein-Resistant Poly(ethylene oxide)-Grafted Surfaces: Chain Density-Dependent Multiple Mechanisms of Action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la702310t
- The paper
- Unsworth, L. D., Sheardown, H., & Brash, J. L. (2008). Protein-Resistant Poly(ethylene oxide)-Grafted Surfaces: Chain Density-Dependent Multiple Mechanisms of Action. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la702310t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.