The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Determination of Cellulose Accessibility to Cellulase Based on Adsorption of a Nonhydrolytic Fusion Protein Containing CBM and GFP with Its Applications
Abstract
Heterogeneous cellulose accessibility is an important substrate characteristic, but all methods for determining cellulose accessibility to the large-size cellulase molecule have some limitations. Characterization of cellulose accessibility to cellulase (CAC) is vital for better understanding of the enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis mechanism (Zhang and Lynd, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 88, 797-824; 2006, 94, 888-898). Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase (m2/g of cellulose) was established based on the Langmuir adsorption of the fusion protein containing a cellulose-binding module (CBM) and a green fluorescent protein (GFP). One molecule of the recombinant fusion protein occupied 21.2 cellobiose lattices on the 110 face of bacterial cellulose nanofibers. The CAC values of several cellulosic materials -- regenerated amorphous cellulose (RAC), bacterial microcrystalline cellulose (BMCC), Whatman No. 1 filter paper, fibrous cellulose powder (CF1), and microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel) -- were 41.9, 33.5, 9.76, 4.53, and 2.38 m2/g, respectively. The CAC value of amorphous cellulose made from Avicel was 17.6-fold larger than that of crystalline cellulose - Avicel. Avicel enzymatic hydrolysis proceeded with a transition from substrate excess to substrate limited. The declining hydrolysis rates over conversion are mainly attributed to a combination of substrate consumption and a decrease in substrate reactivity. Declining heterogeneous cellulose reactivity is significantly attributed to a loss of CAC where the easily hydrolyzed cellulose fraction is digested first.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Substrate and Enzyme Characteristics that Limit Cellulose Hydrolysis
Mansfield, S. D., Mooney, C., & Saddler, J. N. (1999) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp9900864 · Cited by 869
Cited by
Reviving the carbohydrate economy via multi-product lignocellulose biorefineries
Zhang, Y.-H. P. (2008) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10295-007-0293-6 · Cited by 622
Self-citationPretreatment and Lignocellulosic Chemistry
Hu, F., & Ragauskas, A. (2012) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9208-0 · Cited by 462
Zhao, X., Zhang, L., & Liu, D. (2012) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1350 · Cited by 296
Pretreatment of microcrystalline cellulose in organic electrolyte solutions for enzymatic hydrolysis
Tian, X.-F., Fang, Z., Jiang, D., & Sun, X.-Y. (2011) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-4-53 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, J., Ye, X., & Zhang, Y.-H. P.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-11-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 12535-12540
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2006607381
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Determination of Cellulose Accessibility to Cellulase Based on Adsorption of a Nonhydrolytic Fusion Protein Containing CBM and GFP with Its Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la7025686
- The paper
- Hong, J., Ye, X., & Zhang, Y.-H. P. (2007). Quantitative Determination of Cellulose Accessibility to Cellulase Based on Adsorption of a Nonhydrolytic Fusion Protein Containing CBM and GFP with Its Applications. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la7025686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.