Cited by 44Biofuel production and bioconversionAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

Pretreatment of microcrystalline cellulose in organic electrolyte solutions for enzymatic hydrolysis

Open access
Tian, Xiao-fei, Fang, Zhen, Jiang, Dan, Sun, Xi-yan·2011·Biotechnology for Biofuels

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that the crystalline structure of cellulose is negatively correlated with enzymatic digestibility, therefore, pretreatment is required to break down the highly ordered crystalline structure in cellulose, and to increase the porosity of its surface. In the present study, an organic electrolyte solution (OES) composed of an ionic liquid (1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([AMIM]Cl)) and an organic solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide; DMSO) was prepared, and used to pretreat microcrystalline cellulose for subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis; to our knowledge, this is the first time that this method has been used. Results: Microcrystalline cellulose (5 wt%) rapidly dispersed and then completely dissolved in an OES with a molar fraction of [AMIM]Cl per OES (χ [AMIM]Cl) of greater than or equal to 0.2 at 110°C within 10 minutes. The cellulose was regenerated from the OES by precipitation with hot water, and enzymatically hydrolyzed. As the χ [AMIM]Cl of the OES increased from 0.1 to 0.9, both the hydrolysis yield and initial hydrolysis rate of the regenerated cellulose also increased gradually. After treatment using OES with χ [AMIM]Cl of 0.7, the glucose yield (54.1%) was 7.2 times that of untreated cellulose. This promotion of hydrolysis yield was mainly due to the decrease in the degree of crystallinity (that is, the crystallinity index of cellulose I). Conclusions: An OES of [AMIM]Cl and DMSO with χ [AMIM]Cl of 0.7 was chosen for cellulose pretreatment because it dissolved cellulose rapidly to achieve a high glucose yield (54.1%), which was only slightly lower than the value (59.6%) obtained using pure [AMIM]Cl. OES pretreatment is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly technique for hydrolysis, because it 1) uses the less expensive OES instead of pure ionic liquids, 2) shortens dissolution time, 3) requires lower energy for stirring and transporting, and 4) is recyclable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1754-6834-4-53

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The empirical Kamlet-Taft model and the quantum mechanical COSMO-RS model have been used most frequently to predict or explain the solubility of cellulose (and other biopolymers) in ionic liquids, while few literature data exist for Hansen solubility parameters of ionic liquids.

    “The empirical Kamlet-Taft model 69c,d and the quantum mechanical COSMO-RS model 88 have been used most frequently to predict or explain the solubility of cellulose (and other biopolymers) in ionic liquids, while few literature data exist for Hansen solubility parameters of ionic liquids.89”

    From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gaylord Chemical Company Bulletin 101B: Dimethyl sulfoxide physical properties http://www.gaylordchemical.com/uploads/images/pdfs/literature/101B_english.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, X.-F., Fang, Z., Jiang, D., & Sun, X.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Fang, Zhen
Venue
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Published
2011-11-19
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
53-53
ISSN
1754-6834 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161417400
Cited by
44
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-YW-G-075)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
microcrystalline cellulose, cellulose pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, ionic liquids, 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, dimethyl sulfoxide, organic electrolyte solutions, cellulose dissolution, cellulose crystallinity, glucose yield, cellulose regeneration, lignocellulosic biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review