Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

When Wenzel and Cassie Are Right: Reconciling Local and Global Considerations

Marmur, Abraham, Bittoun, Eyal·2009·Langmuir

Abstract

The condition under which the Wenzel or Cassie equation correctly estimates the most stable contact angle is reiterated and demonstrated: these equations do hold when the drop size is sufficiently large compared with the wavelength of roughness or chemical heterogeneity. The numerical demonstrations somewhat mimic recent experiments that seemingly refuted the Wenzel and Cassie equations and show that these experiments were performed only for drops of sizes similar in order of magnitude to the wavelength of roughness or chemical heterogeneity. Under such conditions, the Wenzel and Cassie equations are a priori not expected to be valid. It is also explained that both the local equilibrium condition at the contact line and the global equilibrium condition involving the wetted area within the contact line are necessary and complementary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la802667b

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Marmur, A., & Bittoun, E.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2009-01-07
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
1277-1281
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W1971143490
Cited by
285
References
2
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Wenzel and Cassie Are Right: Reconciling Local and Global Considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la802667b
The paper
Marmur, A., & Bittoun, E. (2009). When Wenzel and Cassie Are Right: Reconciling Local and Global Considerations. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la802667b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.