The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Methods for Screening of Metal Organic Framework Membranes for Gas Separations Using Atomically Detailed Models
Abstract
Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) define a diverse class of nanoporous materials having potential applications in adsorption-based and membrane-based gas separations. We have previously used atomically detailed models to predict the performance of MOFs for membrane-based separations of gases, but these calculations require considerable computational resources and time. Here, we introduce an efficient approximate method for screening MOFs based on atomistic models that will accelerate the modeling of membrane applications. The validity of this approximate method is examined by comparison with detailed calculations for CH4/H2, CO2/CH4, and CO2/H2 mixtures at room temperature permeating through IRMOF-1 and CuBTC membranes. These results allow us to hypothesize a connection between two computationally efficient correlations predicting mixture adsorption and mixture self-diffusion properties and the validity of our approximate screening method. We then apply our model to six additional MOFs, IRMOF-8, -9, -10, and -14, Zn(bdc)(ted)0.5, and COF-102, to examine the effect of chemical diversity and interpenetration on the performance of metal organic framework membranes for light gas separations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved SAPO‐34 Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separations
Li, S., Falconer, J. L., & Noble, R. D. (2006) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200601147 · Cited by 283
Cited by
CO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Highly Permeable Zeolite Imidazolate Framework-8 Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separation
Venna, S. R., & Carreon, M. A. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja909263x · Cited by 956
Biomedical Applications of Metal Organic Frameworks
Keskin, S., & Kızılel, S. (2011) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie101312k · Cited by 607
Self-citationBig-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning
Jablonka, K. M., Ongari, D., Moosavi, S. M., & Smit, B. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00004 · Cited by 599
Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading
Chen, X. Y., Vinh-Thang, H., Ramirez, A. A., Rodrigue, D., & Kaliaguine, S. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra00666j · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Keskin, S., & Sholl, D. S.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-07-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 11786-11795
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2086801882
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.