The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Nanoscale Roughness of Titanium Thin Film Surfaces on Bacterial Retention
Abstract
Two human pathogenic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus CIP 68.5 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9025, were adsorbed onto surfaces containing Ti thin films of varying thickness to determine the extent to which nanoscale surface roughness influences the extent of bacterial attachment. A magnetron sputter thin film system was used to deposit titanium films with thicknesses of 3, 12, and 150 nm on glass substrata with corresponding surface roughness parameters of R(q) 1.6, 1.2, and 0.7 nm (on a 4 microm x 4 microm scanning area). The chemical composition, wettability, and surface architecture of titanium thin films were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, contact angle measurements, atomic force microscopy, three-dimensional interactive visualization, and statistical approximation of the topographic profiles. Investigation of the dynamic evolution of the Ti thin film topographic parameters indicated that three commonly used parameters, R(a), R(q), and R(max), were insufficient to effectively characterize the nanoscale rough/smooth surfaces. Two additional parameters, R(skw) and R(kur), which describe the statistical distributions of roughness character, were found to be useful for evaluating the surface architecture. Analysis of bacterial retention profiles indicated that bacteria responded differently to the surfaces on a scale of less than 1 nm change in the R(a) and R(q) Ti thin film surface roughness parameters by (i) an increased number of retained cells by a factor of 2-3, and (ii) an elevated level of secretion of extracellular polymeric substances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of nonadsorbing polymers in bacterial aggregation
Eboigbodin, K. E., Newton, J. R. A., Routh, A. F., & Biggs, C. A. (2005) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la051740u · Cited by 62
Cited by
Natural Bactericidal Surfaces: Mechanical Rupture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Cells by Cicada Wings
Ivanova, E. P., Hasan, J., Webb, H. K., Truong, V. K., Watson, G. S., Watson, J. A., Baulin, V. A., Pogodin, S., Wang, J. Y., Tobin, M. J., et al. (2012) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201200528 · Cited by 1,019
Self-citationThe influence of nano-scale surface roughness on bacterial adhesion to ultrafine-grained titanium
Truong, V. K., Lapovok, R., Estrin, Y. S., Rundell, S., Wang, J. Y., Fluke, C. J., Crawford, R. J., & Ivanova, E. P. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.071 · Cited by 438
Self-citationThe Influence of Surface Modification on Bacterial Adhesion to Titanium-Based Substrates
Lorenzetti, M., Dogša, I., Stošicki, T., Stopar, D., Kalin, M., Kobe, S., & Novak, S. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am507148n · Cited by 365
Nano-structured antimicrobial surfaces: From nature to synthetic analogues
Elbourne, A., Crawford, R. J., & Ivanova, E. P. (2017) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2017.07.021 · Cited by 365
Self-citationAntibacterial titanium nano-patterned arrays inspired by dragonfly wings
Bhadra, C. M., Khanh Truong, V., Pham, V. T. H., Al Kobaisi, M., Seniutinas, G., Wang, J. Y., Juodkazis, S., Crawford, R. J., & Ivanova, E. P. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16817 · Cited by 308
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivanova, E. P., Truong, V. K., Wang, J. Y., Berndt, C. C., Jones, R. T., Yusuf, I. I., Peake, I., Schmidt, H. W., Fluke, C., Barnes, D., & Crawford, R. J.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-10-20
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1973-1982
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2003327974
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.