The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extending Microcontact Printing as a Microlithographic Technique
Abstract
This paper describes a number of approaches that have been employed to reduce the size of features of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) generated using microcontact printing (μCP). In μCP, an elastomeric stamp is used to print patterned SAMs of alkanethiolates on the surfaces of coinage metals and SAMs of alkylsiloxanes on Si/SiO 2 . It is a convenient technique for generating patterned microstructures with feature sizes ≥ 500 nm. The capability of this technique could be extended to produce features smaller than 500 nm using the following approaches: (1) μCP with mechanical deformation of the elastomeric stamp that is, with lateral compression or uniaxial stretching in the plane of the stamp and with pressure perpendicular to the plane of the stamp; (2) μCP with physical alternation of the elastomeric stamp that is, with a stamp that has been swelled with a solvent or a stamp whose dimensions have been reduced by extraction of an inert filler; (3) μCP with reduction in the size of features resulting from processes taking place on the surface that is, lateral reactive spreading of hexadecanethiol on gold; and (4) μCP with multiple impressions on the same surface. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are evaluated and compared in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Xia, Y., & Whitesides, G. M. (1998) · Annual Review of Materials Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.153 · Cited by 4,611
Self-citationBarbey, R., Lavanant, L., Paripovic, D., Schüwer, N., Sugnaux, C., Tugulu, S., & Klok, H.-A. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900045a · Cited by 1,753
Efimenko, K., Wallace, W. E., & Genzer, J. (2002) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1006/jcis.2002.8594 · Cited by 757
Microcontact Printing: Limitations and Achievements
Perl, A., Reinhoudt, D. N., & Huskens, J. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200801864 · Cited by 447
Reactions of cells to topography
Curtis, A. S. G., & Wilkinson, C. D. W. (1998) · Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition · doi:10.1163/156856298x00415 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, Y., & Whitesides, G. M.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2059-2067
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2013658902
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending Microcontact Printing as a Microlithographic Technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la960936e
- The paper
- Xia, Y., & Whitesides, G. M. (1997). Extending Microcontact Printing as a Microlithographic Technique. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la960936e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.