Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Monolayer Damage in XPS Measurements As Evaluated by Independent Methods

Frydman, Eli, Cohen, Hagai, Maoz, Rivka, Sagiv, Jacob·1997·Langmuir

Abstract

The damage caused to amphiphilic n -alkane monolayers under XPS measurement conditions was assessed in a combined XPS-FTIR study supplemented by additional AFM imaging and contact angle measurements. Nine different self-assembled monolayer/substrate systems were examined, comprising a long chain silane (C 18, OTS), a short chain silane (C 1, MTS), a functional (COOH-terminated) long chain silane (C 18, NTS ox ), a long chain carboxylic acid (C 20, AA), and four different solid substrates (silicon, quartz, glass, and ZnSe). Significant differences were observed in the behavior of the various examined monolayer systems under identical X-ray irradiation conditions. These are interpreted in terms of effects associated with the specific mode of layer-to-surface and intralayer coupling, the size of the monolayer hydrocarbon core, and the presence of radiation-sensitive functional groups in the layer. All these factors and their influence on the degradation path followed by a particular monolayer upon exposure to the X-rays were found to be interrelated, giving rise to a variety of possible damage patterns, including an unexpected overall stabilization effect initiated by the preferential rapid loss of a labile top functional group (NTS ox ). XPS is shown to be insufficient as a tool for the evaluation of the radiation-induced damage in such ultrathin films, because of its insensitivity to loss of hydrogen and to structural transformations that occur without a net loss of carbon from the surface. Independent methods of surface analysis (mainly FTIR), applied in conjunction with XPS, provide a more comprehensive picture of the induced damage, thus permitting a realistic interpretation of the XPS experimental data as well as the design of improved data acquisition procedures. This could also assist in the tailoring of monolayers with predetermined degradability, for specific purposes. Finally, results of combined AFM-XPS-FTIR-contact angle measurements suggest the possible formation of a “diamond-like” surface film upon extensive X-ray irradiation of an OTS/Si monolayer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la962058q

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Frydman, E., Cohen, H., Maoz, R., & Sagiv, J.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
13
Issue
19
Pages
5089-5106
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W1965734176
Cited by
171
References
0
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monolayer Damage in XPS Measurements As Evaluated by Independent Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la962058q
The paper
Frydman, E., Cohen, H., Maoz, R., & Sagiv, J. (1997). Monolayer Damage in XPS Measurements As Evaluated by Independent Methods. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la962058q

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.