Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Calibration of Pore Volume in Adsorption Experiments and Theoretical Models

Neimark, Alexander V., Ravikovitch, Peter I.·1997·Langmuir

Abstract

We propose a new definition of excess adsorption for use in molecular models of adsorption. This definition implies the calibration of theoretical models in a manner mimicking the experimental calibration procedure. The method of theoretical calibration is developed on the example of helium calibration. The notions of the He calibrated pore volume and the He calibrated pore size are introduced, and the He calibrated theoretical excess isotherms are defined. The proposed method diminishes the discrepancies between the theoretical and the experimental excess adsorption isotherms and makes the theory and the experiment entirely consistent. The quantitative estimates are made by means of the nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) applied to the adsorption of He, N 2, and CH 4 in micropores of active carbons at liquid nitrogen and ambient temperatures. It is shown that the experimental He calibration affects significantly the excess isotherms of vapors and supercritical fluids in microporous carbons. The nonmonotonous excess isotherms in molecular size pores are predicted. The theoretical predictions of He adsorption are in qualitative agreement with the experimental isotherm measured on the BPL active carbon at 77 K. The theoretical calibration is recommended for adjustment of any molecular model of adsorption phenomena, such as density functional theory, molecular dynamics, and grand canonical and other Monte Carlo simulations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la970266s

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Neimark, A. V., & Ravikovitch, P. I.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
13
Issue
19
Pages
5148-5160
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2084492616
Cited by
166
References
0
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.