The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of Large Pore MCM-41 Molecular Sieves To Improve Pore Size Analysis Using Nitrogen Adsorption Measurements
Abstract
MCM-41 siliceous molecular sieves were used to test the applicability of the Kelvin equation for nitrogen adsorption in cylindrical pores of the size from 2 to 6.5 nm. It was shown that the Kelvin equation for the hemispherical meniscus, corrected for the statistical film thickness, is in quite good agreement with an experimental relation between the pore size and the capillary condensation pressure. The agreement can be made quantitative in the pore size range from ca. 2 to 6.5 nm, if a simple correction to the Kelvin equation is introduced. The required statistical film thickness curve ( t -curve) was calculated using nitrogen adsorption data for large pore MCM-41 samples and the obtained results were extrapolated using an adsorption isotherm for a macroporous silica gel. Moreover, an accurate analytical representation of the t -curve was found. Since both the corrected Kelvin equation for cylindrical pores and the t -curve have simple analytical forms, they can conveniently be used in a variety of methods to evaluate porosity. It was shown that the BJH method with the corrected Kelvin equation accurately reproduces pore sizes of MCM-41 materials. A comparison was made between the specific surface areas for the MCM-41 samples calculated on the basis of the BET equation and those obtained using other independent methods. The results strongly suggest that when nitrogen adsorption data are used, the BET method overestimates the specific surface area of siliceous materials. The latter conclusion was supported by the examination of the obtained statistical film thickness curve.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Sing, K. S. W. (1985) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac198557040603 · Cited by 24,485
Cited by
Gas Adsorption Characterization of Ordered Organic−Inorganic Nanocomposite Materials
Kruk, M., & Jaroniec, M. (2001) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm0101069 · Cited by 3,413
Self-citationCharacterization of the porous structure of sba-15
Kruk, M., Jaroniec, M., Ko, C. H., & Ryoo, R. (2000) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm000164e · Cited by 1,409
Self-citationUltrathin metal-organic framework array for efficient electrocatalytic water splitting
Duan, J., Chen, S., & Zhao, C. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15341 · Cited by 1,319
Ciesla, U., & Schüth, F. (1999) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/s1387-1811(98)00249-2 · Cited by 1,084
Chen, S., Duan, J., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201305608 · Cited by 658
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruk, M., Jaroniec, M., & Sayari, A.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-11-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 6267-6273
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2039241045
- Cited by
- 1,428
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.