The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of Hydrous Ruthenium Oxide in Pt−Ru Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Anode Electrocatalysts: The Importance of Mixed Electron/Proton Conductivity
Abstract
Pt−Ru is the favored anode catalyst for the oxidation of methanol in direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs). The nanoscale Pt−Ru blacks are accepted to be bimetallic alloys as based on their X-ray diffraction patterns. Our bulk and surface analyses show that although practical Pt−Ru blacks have diffraction patterns consistent with an alloy assignment, they are primarily a mix of Pt metal and Ru oxides plus some Pt oxides and only small amounts of Ru metal. Thermogravimetric analysis and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of as-received Pt−Ru electrocatalysts indicate that DMFC materials contain substantial amounts of hydrous ruthenium oxide (RuO x H y ). A potential misidentification of nanoscale Pt−Ru blacks arises because RuO x H y is amorphous and cannot be discerned by X-ray diffraction. Hydrous ruthenium oxide is a mixed proton and electron conductor and innately expresses Ru−OH speciation. These properties are of key importance in the mechanism of methanol oxidation, in particular, Ru−OH is a critical component of the bifunctional mechanism proposed for direct methanol oxidation in that it is the oxygen-transfer species that oxidatively dissociates −C⋮O fragments from the Pt surface. The catalysts and membrane-electrode assemblies of DMFCs should not be processed at or exposed to temperatures >150 °C, as such conditions deleteriously lower the proton conductivity of hydrous ruthenium oxide and thus affect the ability of the Ru component of the electrocatalyst to dissociate water. With this analytical understanding of the true nature of practical nanoscale Pt−Ru electrocatalysts, we can now recommend that hydrous ruthenium oxide, rather than Ru metal or anhydrous RuO 2, is the preferred Ru speciation in these catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resolving ruthenium: XPS studies of common ruthenium materials
Morgan, D. J. (2015) · Surface and Interface Analysis · doi:10.1002/sia.5852 · Cited by 1,199
Recent advances in catalysts for direct methanol fuel cells
Zhao, X., Yin, M., Ma, L., Liang, L., Liu, C., Liao, J., Lu, T., & Xing, W. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01307f · Cited by 939
Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Gu, J., Su, L., & Cheng, L. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee43886d · Cited by 478
Ruthenium-Based Electrocatalysts Supported on Reduced Graphene Oxide for Lithium-Air Batteries
Jung, H.-G., Jeong, Y. S., Park, J.-B., Sun, Y.-K., Scrosati, B., & Lee, Y. J. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn400477d · Cited by 382
Electrically conductive oxide aerogels: new materials in electrochemistry
Rolison, D. R., & Dunn, B. (2001) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b007591o · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rolison, D. R., Hagans, P. L., Swider, K. E., & Long, J. W.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-01-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 774-779
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2053236759
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Hydrous Ruthenium Oxide in Pt−Ru Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Anode Electrocatalysts: The Importance of Mixed Electron/Proton Conductivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la9807863
- The paper
- Rolison, D. R., Hagans, P. L., Swider, K. E., & Long, J. W. (1999). Role of Hydrous Ruthenium Oxide in Pt−Ru Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Anode Electrocatalysts: The Importance of Mixed Electron/Proton Conductivity. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la9807863
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.