Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pore Size Distributions in Porous Glasses: A Computer Simulation Study

Gelb, Lev D., Gubbins, K. E.·1999·Langmuir

Abstract

We have prepared a series of molecular models of porous glass using a recently developed procedure (Gelb, L. D.; Gubbins, K. E. Langmuir 1998, 14, 2097) that mimics the experimental processes that produce Vycor and controlled-pore glasses. We calculate nitrogen adsorption isotherms in these precisely characterized model glasses using Monte Carlo simulations. These isotherms are analyzed using the Barrett−Joyner−Halenda (BJH) method to yield pore size distributions, which are tested against exact pore size distributions directly measured from the pore structures. The BJH method yields overly sharp distributions that are systematically shifted (by about 1 nm) to lower pore sizes than those from our geometric method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la9808418

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 516

Metadata

Authors
Gelb, L. D., & Gubbins, K. E.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
1998-12-23
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
305-308
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W1990205109
Cited by
516
References
0
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pore Size Distributions in Porous Glasses: A Computer Simulation Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la9808418
The paper
Gelb, L. D., & Gubbins, K. E. (1999). Pore Size Distributions in Porous Glasses: A Computer Simulation Study. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la9808418

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.