The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Observation of Changes in Bacterial Cell Morphology Using Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy
Abstract
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used in tapping mode to probe morphological changes in surface-confined cells resulting from adhesion-modifying chemicals. Bacteria ( Burkholderia cepacia G4 and Pseudomonas stutzeri KC) were exposed to Tween 20, heparin, disodium tetraborate, sodium pyrophosphate, low ionic strength water, lysozyme/ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 3-(4-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid sodium salt (MOPS) buffer (as a control), and the surface topography of the cells was examined after exposure to each chemical. Cells were attached to glass slides for AFM imaging by a new method of cross-linking carboxyl groups on the bacterial surfaces with amine groups that had been coupled to glass slides. Topographic images, phase images, traces of surface topography, and analyses of surface roughness were performed on all samples. We are not aware of any studies besides the present one in which phase imaging has been used on bacteria. Height traces illustrated the effect of different chemical treatments on the cells by showing whether the topography of the cell was altered by the different treatments. The surface roughness was quantified in terms of the root-mean-square (RMS) average of the height deviations. All of the treatment chemicals except disodium tetraborate caused higher RMS values to be measured for G4 and KC. Disodium tetraborate flattened the cells and, therefore, resulted in slightly lower or equal RMS values as the control (MOPS buffer). RMS values were correlated with the qualitative shapes of the cells. Lysozyme/EDTA, sodium pyrophosphate, and disodium tetraborate produced the most damage to cellular morphology, as observed by topographic images and surface traces, and decreased cellular viability. These data show that AFM operated in tapping mode can provide a useful method for investigating the consequences of bacterial exposure to surface-modifying chemicals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal Oxide Nanoparticles as Bactericidal Agents
Stoimenov, P. K., Klinger, R. L., Marchin, G. L., & Klabunde, K. J. (2002) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la0202374 · Cited by 1,887
Sample preparation procedures for biological atomic force microscopy
EL KIRAT, K., BURTON, I., DUPRES, V., & DUFRENE, Y. F. (2005) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2005.01480.x · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Camesano, T. A., Natan, M. J., & Logan, B. E.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-04-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4563-4572
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2054427689
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of Changes in Bacterial Cell Morphology Using Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la990805o
- The paper
- Camesano, T. A., Natan, M. J., & Logan, B. E. (2000). Observation of Changes in Bacterial Cell Morphology Using Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la990805o
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.