The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Poly(vinyl ester) Star Polymers via Xanthate-Mediated Living Radical Polymerization: From Poly(vinyl alcohol) to Glycopolymer Stars
Abstract
Poly(vinyl ester) stars have been synthesized via different macromolecular design via interchange of xanthate (MADIX)/reversible addition−fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization methodologies. Two approaches were investigated. The first method involved attaching the xanthate functionality to the core via a nonfragmenting covalent bond (Z-group approach). The second approach involved attaching the xanthate functionality to the core via a fragmenting covalent bond (R-group approach). The R-group approach yielded well-defined poly(vinyl acetate), poly(vinyl pivalate), and poly(vinyl neodecanoate) stars with narrow polydispersities (PDI ≤ 1.4). In contrast, the molecular weight distributions of poly(vinyl acetate) stars prepared using the Z-approach tended to broaden at moderate to high conversions. We attribute this broadening to steric congestion around the xanthate functionality, restricting the access of monomer to the C S bonds. The R-group approach was also found to be superior for preparing precursor stars suitable for hydrolysis to poly(vinyl alcohol). Hydrolysis of stars generated by the Z-group approach resulted in destruction of the architecture, as the process also cleaved the xanthate linkage at the nexus of the arms and core. Preliminary experiments on using the R-group approach to mediate the star-polymerization of vinyl-functional glycomonomers demonstrated the possibility of generating complex glycopolymer architectures. However, some significant problems were observed, and this synthetic approach requires further optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polymeric systems for controlled drug release
Uhrich, K. E., Cannizzaro, S. M., Langer, R. S., & Shakesheff, K. M. (1999) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr940351u · Cited by 2,633
Cited by
Radical addition–fragmentation chemistry in polymer synthesis
Moad, G., Rizzardo, E., & Thang, S. H. (2008) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2007.11.020 · Cited by 1,397
Bioapplications of RAFT Polymerization
Boyer, C., Bulmus, V., Davis, T. P., Ladmiral, V., Liu, J., & Perrier, S. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9001403 · Cited by 1,015
Self-citationLiving Radical Polymerization by the RAFT Process—A First Update
Moad, G., Rizzardo, E., & Thang, S. H. (2006) · Australian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1071/ch06250 · Cited by 848
Gao, H., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2009) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.01.001 · Cited by 799
Gregory, A., & Stenzel, M. H. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.004 · Cited by 470
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernard, J., Favier, A., Zhang, L., Nilasaroya, A., Davis, T. P., Barner-Kowollik, C., & Stenzel, M. H.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-05-27
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5475-5484
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W1989872673
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.