The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anthracene−Maleimide-Based Diels−Alder “Click Chemistry” as a Novel Route to Graft Copolymers
Abstract
Using the Diels−Alder (DA) “click chemistry” strategy between anthracene and maleimide functional groups, two series of well-defined polystyrene- g -poly(ethylene glycol) (PS- g -PEG) and polystyrene- g -poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS- g -PMMA) copolymers were successfully prepared. The whole process was divided into two stages: (i) preparation of anthracene and maleimide functional polymers and (ii) the use of Diels−Alder reaction of these groups. First, random copolymers of styrene (S) and chloromethylstyrene (CMS) with various CMS contents were prepared by the nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization (NMP) process. Then, the choromethyl groups were converted to anthryl groups via the etherifaction with 9-anthracenemethanol. The other component of the click reaction, namely protected maleimide functional polymers, were prepared independently by the modification of commercially available poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) obtained by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using the corresponding functional initiator. Then, in the final stage PEG and PMMA prepolymers were deprotected by retro-Diels−Alder in situ reaction by heating at 110 °C in toluene. The recovered maleimide groups and added anthryl functional polystyrene undergo Diels−Alder reaction to form the respective (PS- g -PEG) and (PS- g -PMMA) copolymers. The graft copolymers and the intermediates were characterized in detail by using 1 H NMR, GPC, UV, fluorescence, DSC, and AFM measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PEG- and Peptide-Grafted Aliphatic Polyesters by Click Chemistry
Parrish, B., Breitenkamp, R. B., & Emrick, T. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja050310n · Cited by 579
Riva, R., Schmeits, S., Stoffelbach, F., Jérôme, C., Jérôme, R., & Lecomte, P. (2005) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/b510282k · Cited by 208
Cited by
Ouchi, M., Terashima, T., & Sawamoto, M. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900234b · Cited by 1,257
Self-healing gels based on constitutional dynamic chemistry and their potential applications
Wei, Z., Yang, J. H., Zhou, J., Xu, F., Zrínyi, M., Dussault, P. H., Osada, Y., & Chen, Y. M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00219a · Cited by 896
“Click”‐Chemistry in Polymer and Material Science: the Update
Binder, W. H. (2008) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.200800332 · Cited by 567
Thio-Click Modification of Poly[2-(3-butenyl)-2-oxazoline]
Gress, A., Völkel, A., & Schlaad, H. (2007) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma071357r · Cited by 417
van Dijk, M., Rijkers, D. T. S., Liskamp, R. M. J., van Nostrum, C. F., & Hennink, W. E. (2009) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc900087a · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Gacal, B., Durmaz, H., Tasdelen, M. A., Hizal, G., Tunca, U., Yagci, Y., & Demirel, A. L.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-07-14
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5330-5336
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2018187379
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.