The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large Strain Hysteresis and Mullins Effect of Tough Double-Network Hydrogels
Abstract
Systematic loading and unloading experiments, in uniaxial tension and uniaxial compression, have been performed on a double-network hydrogel exhibiting a very high toughness. We observed a significant hysteresis during the first loading cycle that increased strongly with the applied maximum deformation. A large hysteresis was not observed during a second loading cycle, implying that the initial hysteresis can be attributed to the fracture of covalent bonds in the primary network. We report this type of dissipative mechanism for polymer gels for the first time. Assuming that the entire energy dissipated during the hysteresis cycle can be attributed to the fracture of network strands by a Lake−Thomas mechanism, our results suggest that the fracture and unloading of only 1% of the bonds within the network leads to a decrease of up to 80% of the number of strands. These results also demonstrate the very large degree of heterogeneity within the hydrogel network. If such a dissipative mechanism is active at the crack tip, it will most likely greatly increase the energy necessary to propagate a macroscopic crack, elucidating the origin of the toughness in these interesting materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The tube model theory of rubber elasticity
Edwards, S. F., & Vilgis, T. A. (1988) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/51/2/003 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Why are double network hydrogels so tough?
Gong, J. P. (2010) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/b924290b · Cited by 2,328
Self-citationPhysical hydrogels composed of polyampholytes demonstrate high toughness and viscoelasticity
Sun, T. L., Kurokawa, T., Kuroda, S., Ihsan, A. B., Akasaki, T., Sato, K., Haque, M. A., Nakajima, T., & Gong, J. P. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3713 · Cited by 2,089
Self-citationMulti-scale multi-mechanism design of tough hydrogels: building dissipation into stretchy networks
Zhao, X. (2014) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c3sm52272e · Cited by 1,252
A review on the Mullins effect
Diani, J., Fayolle, B., & Gilormini, P. (2009) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.11.017 · Cited by 1,249
Toughening Elastomers with Sacrificial Bonds and Watching Them Break
Ducrot, E., Chen, Y., Bulters, M., Sijbesma, R. P., & Creton, C. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248494 · Cited by 1,203
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Webber, R. E., Creton, C., Brown, H. R., & Gong, J. P.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-03-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2919-2927
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2047815593
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.