The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why are double network hydrogels so tough?
Abstract
Double-network (DN) gels have drawn much attention as an innovative material having both high water content (ca. 90 wt%) and high mechanical strength and toughness. DN gels are characterized by a special network structure consisting of two types of polymer components with opposite physical natures: the minor component is abundantly cross-linked polyelectrolytes (rigid skeleton) and the major component comprises of poorly cross-linked neutral polymers (ductile substance). The former and the latter components are referred to as the first network and the second network, respectively, since the synthesis should be done in this order to realize high mechanical strength. For DN gels synthesized under suitable conditions (choice of polymers, feed compositions, atmosphere for reaction, etc.), they possess hardness (elastic modulus of 0.1–1.0 MPa), strength (failure tensile nominal stress 1–10 MPa, strain 1000–2000%; failure compressive nominal stress 20–60 MPa, strain 90–95%), and toughness (tearing fracture energy of 100∼1000 J m−2). These excellent mechanical performances are comparable to that of rubbers and soft load-bearing bio-tissues. The mechanical behaviors of DN gels are inconsistent with general mechanisms that enhance the toughness of soft polymeric materials. Thus, DN gels present an interesting and challenging problem in polymer mechanics. Extensive experimental and theoretical studies have shown that the toughening of DN gel is based on a local yielding mechanism, which has some common features with other brittle and ductile nano-composite materials, such as bones and dentins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrogels for biomedical applications
Hoffman, A. S. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00239-3 · Cited by 4,864
Sakai, T., Matsunaga, T., Yamamoto, Y., Ito, C., Yoshida, R., Suzuki, S., Sasaki, N., Shibayama, M., & Chung, U.-I. (2008) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma800476x · Cited by 1,274
Fantner, G. E., Hassenkam, T., Kindt, J. H., Weaver, J. C., Birkedal, H., Pechenik, L., Cutroni, J. A., Cidade, G. A. G., Stucky, G. D., Morse, D. E., et al. (2005) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1428 · Cited by 933
Cited by
Physical hydrogels composed of polyampholytes demonstrate high toughness and viscoelasticity
Sun, T. L., Kurokawa, T., Kuroda, S., Ihsan, A. B., Akasaki, T., Sato, K., Haque, M. A., Nakajima, T., & Gong, J. P. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3713 · Cited by 2,089
Self-citation25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 · Cited by 1,901
25th Anniversary Article: Rational Design and Applications of Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine
Annabi, N., Tamayol, A., Uquillas, J. A., Akbari, M., Bertassoni, L. E., Cha, C., Camci‐Unal, G., Dokmeci, M. R., Peppas, N. A., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201303233 · Cited by 1,409
Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: a review
Sun, L., Huang, W. M., Ding, Z., Zhao, Y., Wang, C. C., Purnawali, H., & Tang, C. (2012) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.065 · Cited by 1,105
Skin-inspired hydrogel–elastomer hybrids with robust interfaces and functional microstructures
Yuk, H., Zhang, T., Parada, G. A., Liu, X., & Zhao, X. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12028 · Cited by 1,035
Metadata
- Authors
- Gong, J. P.
- Venue
- Soft Matter
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2583
- ISSN
- 1744-683X (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6848
- OpenAlex
- W2099213797
- Cited by
- 2,328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why are double network hydrogels so tough? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b924290b
- The paper
- Gong, J. P. (2010). Why are double network hydrogels so tough? Soft Matter. https://doi.org/10.1039/b924290b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.