The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanism of Degradation of Starch, a Highly Branched Polymer, during Extrusion
Abstract
An investigation of the mechanisms of degradation of a branched polymer in extrusion was performed using starch as substrate. Starch has the advantage that the distribution of degree of polymerization of individual branches can be readily obtained using a debranching enzyme and also that it does not undergo any reaction except scission during extrusion, thereby aiding mechanistic interpretation. Various starches, containing a range of the highly branched amylopectin component and the much less branched amylose component, were extruded in the presence of water and glycerol as plasticizers with extruder barrel temperatures ranging from 50 °C at the hopper zone through to 140 °C near the die exit. Analysis by size-exclusion chromatography of both whole and debranched samples subject to various levels of extrusion showed that the extrusion degradation process involved preferential cleaving of larger molecules, while causing the size distribution to narrow and converge toward a maximum stable size. This is analogous to a similar effect of shear degradation of droplets in emulsions. It was also found that the susceptibility of polymer molecules to shear degradation is not only dependent on the size of the molecule but also extensively influenced by the branching structure. High branching density and short branch length were associated with higher susceptibility to shear degradation. This is explained by the hypothesis that a short-chain hyperbranched polymer has a relatively inflexible structure, leading to a higher susceptibility to shear scission. The degradation process is not significantly selective toward the length of individual branches when the polymer is in a molten state but it preferentially breaks longer branches when the starch polymer is in a semicrystalline granular form. These inferences are generally applicable and use the additional information from the branch length distribution and absence of side reactions, which is generally not available for synthetic polymers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanical Recycling of Packaging Plastics: A Review
Schyns, Z. O. G., & Shaver, M. P. (2021) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.202000415 · Cited by 1,643
Physical Modification of Food Starch Functionalities
BeMiller, J. N., & Huber, K. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1146/annurev-food-022814-015552 · Cited by 323
Xie, F., Halley, P. J., & Avérous, L. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.07.002 · Cited by 301
Self-citationZhang, B., Chen, L., Li, X., Li, L., & Zhang, H. (2015) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.002 · Cited by 253
Tran, T. T. B., Shelat, K. J., Tang, D., Li, E., Gilbert, R. G., & Hasjim, J. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf105021r · Cited by 177
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, W.-C., Halley, P. J., & Gilbert, R. G.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-02-24
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2855-2864
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W1987023664
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of Degradation of Starch, a Highly Branched Polymer, during Extrusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ma100067x
- The paper
- Liu, W.-C., Halley, P. J., & Gilbert, R. G. (2010). Mechanism of Degradation of Starch, a Highly Branched Polymer, during Extrusion. Macromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma100067x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.