The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational Design of High Performance Conjugated Polymers for Organic Solar Cells
Open accessAbstract
The research on the polymer-based solar cells (PSCs) has attracted an increasing amount of attention in recent years because PSCs pose potential advantages over mainstream inorganic-based solar cells, such as significantly reduced material/fabrication costs, flexible substrates, and light weight of finished solar cells. The research community has made great progress in the field of bulk heterojunction (BHJ) polymer solar cells since its inception in 1995. The power conversion efficiency (PCE), a key parameter to assess the performance of solar cells, has increased from 1% in the 1990s to over 8% just recently. These great advances are mainly fueled by the development of conjugated polymers used as the electron-donating materials in BHJ solar cells. In this Perspective, we first briefly review the progress on the design of conjugated polymers for polymer solar cells in the past 16 years. Since a conjugated polymer can be arbitrarily divided into three constituting components—the conjugated backbone, the side chains, and the substituents—we then focus on the rational design of conjugated polymers by separately discussing the influence of each component on the physical and photovoltaic (PV) properties of these polymers. Special attention is paid to the design of donor–acceptor type low-band-gap polymers because this approach is prevailing in the literature with its unique features. In doing so, we strive to extract useful rules for the rational design of conjugated polymers with predictable properties. We conclude by proposing future research opportunities to achieve even higher PCEs for PSCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conjugated Polymer-Based Organic Solar Cells
Günes, S., Neugebauer, H., & Sariciftci, N. S. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050149z · Cited by 6,279
Coffin, R. C., Peet, J., Rogers, J., & Bazan, G. C. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.403 · Cited by 597
Matsuo, Y., Sato, Y., Niinomi, T., Soga, I., Tanaka, H., & Nakamura, E. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9048702 · Cited by 488
Cited by
Bin, H., Gao, L., Zhang, Z.-G., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Chen, S., Xue, L., Yang, C., Xiao, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13651 · Cited by 987
Designing π-conjugated polymers for organic electronics
Guo, X., Baumgarten, M., & Müllen, K. (2013) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.09.005 · Cited by 836
Polymer donor–polymer acceptor (all-polymer) solar cells
Facchetti, A. (2013) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2013.04.005 · Cited by 688
Conjugated polymers for visible-light-driven photocatalysis
Dai, C., & Liu, B. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee01935a · Cited by 687
Single‐Junction Organic Solar Cells Based on a Novel Wide‐Bandgap Polymer with Efficiency of 9.7%
Huo, L., Liu, T., Sun, X., Cai, Y., Heeger, A. J., & Sun, Y. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201500647 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, H., Yang, L., & You, W.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-01-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 607-632
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2040134054
- Cited by
- 1,501
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 139.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.