The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rheology and Phase Behavior of Lyotropic Cellulose Nanocrystal Suspensions
Abstract
The dispersion microstructure and rheological properties of aqueous sulfonated cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) suspensions have been investigated. Between 3.07 and 10.4 vol % the suspensions phase separated into liquid crystalline and isotropic domains. At 12.1 vol %, no isotropic phase was visible, and the samples had the fingerprint texture characteristic of a cholesteric liquid crystal. Below 35 °C, temperature had little influence on rheology and phase behavior. However, between 35 and 40 °C there was a significant change in both the fraction of isotropic phase and the rheological properties. In contrast to many lyotropic suspensions, the steady shear viscosity did not go through a maximum with increasing concentration. Maxima were observed for complex viscosity, storage modulus, and loss modulus at concentrations that appeared fully liquid crystalline. Time–concentration superposition was successful for the loss modulus but not the storage modulus. This suggests that the interface in biphasic samples affects the elastic relaxation but not the viscous response. At still higher concentrations, the fingerprint texture of the liquid crystal phase was absent, and the dispersions behaved as rheological gels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Beck-Candanedo, S., Roman, M., & Gray, D. G. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049300p · Cited by 1,588
Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose
DONG, X. M., REVOL, J.-F., & GRAY, D. G. (1998) · Cellulose · doi:10.1023/a:1009260511939 · Cited by 1,032
Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: Structure, properties and applications
de Souza Lima, M. M., & Borsali, R. (2004) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.200300268 · Cited by 894
Cited by
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Chan, K. J., Clift, M. J. D., Cranston, E. D., Eichhorn, S. J., et al. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j · Cited by 1,021
Rheology of Nanocrystalline Cellulose Aqueous Suspensions
Shafiei-Sabet, S., Hamad, W. Y., & Hatzikiriakos, S. G. (2012) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la303380v · Cited by 361
Dynamics of Cellulose Nanocrystal Alignment during 3D Printing
Hausmann, M. K., Rühs, P. A., Siqueira, G., Läuger, J., Libanori, R., Zimmermann, T., & Studart, A. R. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b02366 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Ureña-Benavides, E. E., Ao, G., Davis, V. A., & Kitchens, C. L.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-10-24
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 8990-8998
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2332088472
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.