Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Processing–Morphology–Property Relationships and Composite Theory Analysis of Reduced Graphene Oxide/Natural Rubber Nanocomposites

Potts, Jeffrey R., Shankar, Om, Du, Ling, Ruoff, Rodney S.·2012·Macromolecules

Abstract

Dispersion of reduced graphene oxide (RG-O) into natural rubber (NR) was found to dramatically enhance the mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties of NR. However, property improvements were strongly dependent upon the processing history and nanocomposite morphology. Co-coagulating a stable RG-O suspension with NR latex afforded a weblike morphology consisting of platelet networks between the latex particles, while two-roll mill processing broke down this structure, yielding a homogeneous and improved dispersion. The physical properties of RG-O/NR vulcanizates with both morphologies were compared over a range of loadings; it was found that the network morphology was highly beneficial for thermal and electrical conductivity properties and greatly increased stiffness but was detrimental to elongation. A detailed comparative analysis of composite models found the Guth equation gave excellent fit to modulus data of the milled samples when taking the shape factor as equal to the platelet aspect ratio quantified from transmission electron microscopy analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma300706k

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Potts, J. R., Shankar, O., Du, L., & Ruoff, R. S.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2012-07-19
Volume
45
Issue
15
Pages
6045-6055
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2315426058
Cited by
348
References
2
FWCI
20.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.