The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure–Conductivity Relationship for Peptoid-Based PEO–Mimetic Polymer Electrolytes
Abstract
Polymer electrolytes offer great potential for application in lithium batteries. In order to systematically optimize the performance of these materials, atomic level synthetic control over the polymer chemical structure is desired. In this study, we designed a series of chemically defined, monodisperse peptoid polymers to explore the impact of side-chain structure on the thermal and electrical properties. A series of comblike peptoid homopolymers with ethylene oxide (EO) n side chains of varying length were synthesized by a rapid solid phase synthetic method. The electrical properties of these materials with dissolved lithium salt were characterized by ac impedance. The temperature dependence of the ionic conductivity of the polypeptoid electrolytes is consistent with the Vogel–Tamman–Fulcher equation. The optimum ionic conductivity of 2.6 × 10 –4 S/cm achieved for oligo- N -2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethylglycine–Li salt complex at 100 °C, is approximately 10-fold lower than the analogous PEO–salt complex. It is, however, nearly 2 orders of magnitude higher than previously reported comblike PEO–mimetic polypeptides. The ionic conductivities of these side chain analogs vary by 3 orders of magnitude, but this variation is entirely governed by the proximity of the system to the glass transition temperature. This investigation shows that polypeptoids provide a unique platform for examining the structure–property relationships of solid polymer electrolytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polyphosphazene solid electrolytes
Blonsky, P. M., Shriver, D. F., Austin, P., & Allcock, H. R. (1984) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00334a071 · Cited by 510
Cited by
Poly(ethylene oxide)-based electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries
Xue, Z., He, D., & Xie, X. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c5ta03471j · Cited by 2,302
Designing polymers for advanced battery chemistries
Lopez, J., Mackanic, D. G., Cui, Y., & Bao, Z. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0103-6 · Cited by 894
Hallinan, D. T., & Balsara, N. P. (2013) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121705 · Cited by 853
Self-citationBlock copolymer electrolytes for rechargeable lithium batteries
Young, W., Kuan, W., & Epps (2014) · Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics · doi:10.1002/polb.23404 · Cited by 417
Peptoids and Polypeptoids at the Frontier of Supra- and Macromolecular Engineering
Gangloff, N., Ulbricht, J., Lorson, T., Schlaad, H., & Luxenhofer, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00201 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, J., Stone, G. M., Balsara, N. P., & Zuckermann, R. N.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5151-5156
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2121407980
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.