The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Click”-Inspired Chemistry in Macromolecular Science: Matching Recent Progress and User Expectations
Abstract
This year, it has been a decade that the concept of “click” chemistry was pioneered in polymer and material science by the exploration of the synthetic scope of copper-catalyzed azide/alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), the “click” benchmark. The impact on the endeavors of polymer chemists has been substantial because the power of this concept, featuring modularity, orthogonality, and versatility for the design and synthesis of polymeric materials, was recognized very soon in macromolecular research groups worldwide. After this first burst of research activity, challenging the boundaries of CuAAC in terms of attainable polymer constructs, ongoing method development, and implementation, in response to the need for metal-free alternatives, resulted in a valuable toolbox of “click”-inspired conjugation methods. Because of the large diversity of employable reactions, applied in various polymeric systems, the first-time or occasional “click” user will be confronted with a burden of choice. Therefore, the principal aim of this Perspective is to clearly denote the recent progress of “click”-inspired chemistry in macromolecular science by detailed conceptual analysis and to provide some selection procedures, allowing potential users to readily match their expectations of “click” chemistry to the state-of-the-art. Consequently, first-time or occasional users should be able to identify and select the most appropriate “click”-inspired reaction for their purposes and eventually contribute to the next generations of advanced polymeric materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tornøe, C. W., Christensen, C., & Meldal, M. (2002) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo011148j · Cited by 8,696
Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions
Stohs, S. J., & Bagchi, D. (1995) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-h · Cited by 4,219
Controlled/living radical polymerization: Features, developments, and perspectives
Braunecker, W. A., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.11.002 · Cited by 3,202
Radical addition–fragmentation chemistry in polymer synthesis
Moad, G., Rizzardo, E., & Thang, S. H. (2008) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2007.11.020 · Cited by 1,397
The convergence of synthetic organic and polymer chemistries
Hawker, C. J., & Wooley, K. L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1109778 · Cited by 1,298
Marrying click chemistry with polymerization: expanding the scope of polymeric materials
Golas, P. L., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b901978m · Cited by 863
PEG- and Peptide-Grafted Aliphatic Polyesters by Click Chemistry
Parrish, B., Breitenkamp, R. B., & Emrick, T. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja050310n · Cited by 579
Cited by
50th Anniversary Perspective: Polymer Functionalization
Blasco, E., Sims, M. B., Goldmann, A. S., Sumerlin, B. S., & Barner-Kowollik, C. (2017) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00465 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Espeel, P., & Du Prez, F. E.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-11-26
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-14
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W1977827348
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.