The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enzymatic Degradability of Poly(lactide): Effects of Chain Stereochemistry and Material Crystallinity
Abstract
Polylactide (PLA) stereocopolymers with ( l ) repeat unit contents of 75%, 80%, 82%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 94%, and 95% were prepared from mixtures of ( l )-/( d )-lactide and ( l )-/ meso -lactide. Compression molding of these products gave amorphous films which, for ( l ) contents ≥90%, were also annealed above T g to crystallize. Analyses by differential scanning calorimetry and wide angle X-ray scattering gave information on the crystalline order of PLA films. For identical ( l ) contents, stereocopolymers of ( l )-/( d )-lactide had higher crystallinities than those from ( l )-/ meso -lactide. PLA films were incubated with proteinase K (from Tritirachium album ), and the enzyme-catalyzed film weight loss rates were measured. Film crystallinity, chain stereochemical composition, and repeat unit sequence distribution were analyzed as independent variables affecting film enzymatic hydrolysis. Amorphous films from ( l )/( d )-lactide copolymerizations with ( l ) compositions ranging from 80% to 95% exhibited film weight loss rates that were almost identical. Also, amorphous PLA films prepared from ( l )-/ meso -lactide copolymers for ( l ) contents of 80−95% showed a similar invariability in weight loss rates. It was concluded that proteinase K has a high degree of tolerance for ( d ) repeat units. Amorphous PLA films from ( l )-lactide/ meso -lactide copolymerizations had weight loss rates which were about 43% slower than amorphous PLA films from ( l )-/( d )-lactide copolymerizations. These results were analyzed considering differences in chain stereosequence distributions. Proteinase K showed an extraordinarily high sensitivity to film crystalline order. For example, the decrease in the film weight loss rate due to crystalline order for a 95% ( l ) ( l )-/( d )-lactide stereocopolymer was 93%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, R. A., Brady, J. M., & Cutright, D. E. (1977) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820110507 · Cited by 722
Kricheldorf, H. R., Berl, M., & Scharnagl, N. (1988) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00180a002 · Cited by 597
Cited by
An Overview of Polylactides as Packaging Materials
Auras, R., Harte, B., & Selke, S. (2004) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.200400043 · Cited by 3,454
Tokiwa, Y., Calabia, B. P., Ugwu, C. U., & Aiba, S. (2009) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms10093722 · Cited by 1,782
Biodegradability and biodegradation of poly(lactide)
Tokiwa, Y., & Calabia, B. P. (2006) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-006-0488-1 · Cited by 665
Payne, J., & Jones, M. D. (2021) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.202100400 · Cited by 426
A circular economy approach to plastic waste
Payne, J., McKeown, P., & Jones, M. D. (2019) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.05.014 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- MacDonald, R. T., McCarthy, S. P., & Gross, R. A.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 7356-7361
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2007589252
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enzymatic Degradability of Poly(lactide): Effects of Chain Stereochemistry and Material Crystallinity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ma960513j
- The paper
- MacDonald, R. T., McCarthy, S. P., & Gross, R. A. (1996). Enzymatic Degradability of Poly(lactide): Effects of Chain Stereochemistry and Material Crystallinity. Macromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma960513j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.