Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enzymatic Degradability of Poly(lactide): Effects of Chain Stereochemistry and Material Crystallinity

MacDonald, Renée T., McCarthy, Stephen P., Gross, Richard A.·1996·Macromolecules

Abstract

Polylactide (PLA) stereocopolymers with ( l ) repeat unit contents of 75%, 80%, 82%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 94%, and 95% were prepared from mixtures of ( l )-/( d )-lactide and ( l )-/ meso -lactide. Compression molding of these products gave amorphous films which, for ( l ) contents ≥90%, were also annealed above T g to crystallize. Analyses by differential scanning calorimetry and wide angle X-ray scattering gave information on the crystalline order of PLA films. For identical ( l ) contents, stereocopolymers of ( l )-/( d )-lactide had higher crystallinities than those from ( l )-/ meso -lactide. PLA films were incubated with proteinase K (from Tritirachium album ), and the enzyme-catalyzed film weight loss rates were measured. Film crystallinity, chain stereochemical composition, and repeat unit sequence distribution were analyzed as independent variables affecting film enzymatic hydrolysis. Amorphous films from ( l )/( d )-lactide copolymerizations with ( l ) compositions ranging from 80% to 95% exhibited film weight loss rates that were almost identical. Also, amorphous PLA films prepared from ( l )-/ meso -lactide copolymers for ( l ) contents of 80−95% showed a similar invariability in weight loss rates. It was concluded that proteinase K has a high degree of tolerance for ( d ) repeat units. Amorphous PLA films from ( l )-lactide/ meso -lactide copolymerizations had weight loss rates which were about 43% slower than amorphous PLA films from ( l )-/( d )-lactide copolymerizations. These results were analyzed considering differences in chain stereosequence distributions. Proteinase K showed an extraordinarily high sensitivity to film crystalline order. For example, the decrease in the film weight loss rate due to crystalline order for a 95% ( l ) ( l )-/( d )-lactide stereocopolymer was 93%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma960513j

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
MacDonald, R. T., McCarthy, S. P., & Gross, R. A.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
29
Issue
23
Pages
7356-7361
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2007589252
Cited by
260
References
41
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.