The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preparation and in vitro degradation properties of polylactide microcapsules.
Open accessAbstract
Polylactide (PLA) microcapsules with an average diameter of 1.5μm were prepared by an interfacial deposition technique. The degree of degradation of PLA microcapsules was estimated by determination of the amount of lactic acid as a final product in bulk solution and from the molecular weight distribution of PLA of the microcapsules remaining undegraded by means of gel permeation chromatography using chloroform as the eluent. The rate of hydrolytic degradation of PLA microcapsules prepared by using poly (D, L-lactide) or poly (L-lactide) was extremely pH-dependent ; it was slowest at pH around 5.0 and it increased in both strongly acidic and strongly alkaline solutions. The activation energy of deesterification at pH 7.4 and ionic strength 0.15 was calculated to be 19.9kcal/mol for poly (D, L-lactide) microcapsules and 20.0 kcal/mol for poly (L-lactide) microcapsules, when the initial weight-average molecular weight was about 100000 for both polymers. These values are comparable to those found for the hydrolysis of alkyl acetates.1) In buffer solution (pH 9.6), the hydrolytic degradation was enhanced when the ionic strength of the medium was increased. Chromatographic analysis of the products of hydrolytic degradation suggested that OH- or H3O+ attacks the ester bonds located in the crystalline zone, followed by further cleavage of the initial products into fractions with lower molecular weights. Carboxylic esterase promoted the degradation by cleaving the ester bonds located in the crystalline zone directly. Urea and NaSCN accelerated the degradation effectively, while AlCl3, CaCl2, and KCl had no or little effect on the degradation rate. Poly (L-lactide) microcapsules were degraded less rapidly than poly (D, L-lactide) microcapsules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, S. M., Garreau, H., & Vert, M. (1990) · Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf00700871 · Cited by 733
Dunne, M., Corrigan, O. I., & Ramtoola, Z. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00040-5 · Cited by 444
FIP/AAPS guidelines to dissolution/in vitro release testing of novel/special dosage forms
Siewert, M., Dressman, J., Brown, C. K., Shah, V. P., Aiache, J.-M., Aoyagi, N., Bashaw, D., Brown, C., Brown, W., Burgess, D., et al. (2003) · AAPS PharmSciTech · doi:10.1208/pt040107 · Cited by 373
MacDonald, R. T., McCarthy, S. P., & Gross, R. A. (1996) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma960513j · Cited by 260
Park, T. G., Lu, W., & Crotts, G. (1995) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/0168-3659(94)00084-8 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- MAKINO, K., ARAKAWA, M., & KONDO, T.
- Venue
- Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
- Publisher
- Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1195-1201
- ISSN
- 0009-2363 (ISSN-L)
- 1347-5223
- OpenAlex
- W2057641814
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation and in vitro degradation properties of polylactide microcapsules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1248/cpb.33.1195
- The paper
- MAKINO, K., ARAKAWA, M., & KONDO, T. (1985). Preparation and in vitro degradation properties of polylactide microcapsules. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.33.1195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.