The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rigidity of Two-Component Hydrogels Prepared from Alginate and Poly(ethylene glycol)−Diamines
Abstract
Alginate hydrogels have been attractive for a variety of biomedical applications, but they possess limited mechanical properties when ionically cross-linked with divalent cations. Therefore, covalent cross-linking of alginate with poly(ethylene glycol)−diamines of various molecular weights was investigated as a means to generate hydrogels with a range of mechanical properties. Hydrogels with a range of elastic moduli could be generated by controlling either the chain length of the cross-linking molecule or the cross-linking density. The elastic modulus increased gradually with an increase in cross-linking density or weight fraction of PEG in the hydrogel up to ∼27% (w/w) of PEG. The change of mechanical properties was interpreted in terms of molecular weight between cross-links ( M c ) according to the rubber-elasticity model, and the results of this analysis were generally consistent with the measured PEG−diamine incorporation efficiencies in this range. However, as the weight fraction of PEG in the hydrogels increased above 27%, regardless of the molecular weight of PEG, the elastic moduli decreased. This is not consistent with prediction based on the rubber-elasticity theory, and this is likely due to the fact that this model does not consider cross-linking with a second macromolecule. Importantly, the results of this study suggest that the mechanical properties of hydrogels will be strongly affected by the properties of the cross-linking molecule as the M c of hydrogels falls below the molecular weight of the cross-linking molecule.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrophilic gels for biological use
WICHTERLE, O., & LÍM, D. (1960) · Nature · doi:10.1038/185117a0 · Cited by 2,996
Cited by
Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications
Drury, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00340-5 · Cited by 5,136
Self-citationInjectable alginate hydrogels for cell delivery in tissue engineering
Bidarra, S. J., Barrias, C. C., & Granja, P. L. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.006 · Cited by 534
pH-induced shape-memory polymers
Han, X., Dong, Z., Fan, M., Liu, Y., li, J., Wang, Y., Yuan, Q., Li, B., & Zhang, S. (2012) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.201200153 · Cited by 304
Hydrogels for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering
Varghese, S., & Elisseeff, J. H. (2006) · Advances in Polymer Science · doi:10.1007/12_072 · Cited by 173
Alginate hydrogels with tuneable properties
Smith, A. M., & Senior, J. J. (2021) · Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2020_161 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Eiselt, P., Lee, K. Y., & Mooney, D. J.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 5561-5566
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2079844590
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.