Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Well-Defined, Model Long Chain Branched Polyethylene. 1. Synthesis and Characterization

Hadjichristidis, Nikos, Xenidou, Maria, Iatrou, Hermis, Pitsikalis, Marinos, Poulos, Yiannis, Avgeropoulos, Apostolis, Sioula, Stella, Paraskeva, Stella, Velis, Gabriel, Lohse, David J., Schulz, Donald N., Fetters, Lewis J., Wright, Pamela J., Mendelson, Robert A., García-Franco, César A., Sun, Thomas, Ruff, Charles J.·2000·Macromolecules

Abstract

We describe the synthesis and characterization of a number of polymers with well-defined structures that serve as models for polyethylene with long chain branching. All of them have been made by using anionic polymerization techniques and controlled chlorosilane chemistry to give nearly monodisperse polybutadienes with precise control of the number, length, and placement of long ( M̄ w > 1500 g/mol) branches on each chain. This was followed by hydrogenation to give saturated polymers with the same well-defined long chain branching and the local structure of a typical linear low-density polyethylene. That is, both the backbones and the long branches had 17−25 ethyl branches per 1000 total carbons. Among the structures made were some with no long branches (“linears”), some with a single long branch (“stars”), others with exactly two branch points (the α − ω type, “H's”, “super-H's”, and “pom-poms”), and some with several long branches randomly distributed along the backbone (“combs”). Essentially all types of branching from a linear backbone can be made by the techniques described herein. While linear and symmetrical star models of polyethylene have been made previously, the other structures are the first examples of polyethylene models with multiple branches and precise control of the molecular architecture. We use the results given here to discuss how long chain branching can be detected in polyethylene. We also show how the branching structure controls chain dimensions. The Zimm−Stockmayer model works well to describe the sizes of the lightly branched molecules, but its predictions are too small for those with many long branches. This is presumably due to crowding of the branches. The rheological properties of these polymers will be described in subsequent publications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma991670w

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Hadjichristidis, N., Xenidou, M., Iatrou, H., Pitsikalis, M., Poulos, Y., Avgeropoulos, A., Sioula, S., Paraskeva, S., Velis, G., Lohse, D. J., Schulz, D. N., Fetters, L. J., Wright, P. J., Mendelson, R. A., García-Franco, C. A., Sun, T., & Ruff, C. J.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2000-03-16
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
2424-2436
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2034850439
Cited by
162
References
6
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.