Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lipoplexes Targeting the CD44 Hyaluronic Acid Receptor for Efficient Transfection of Breast Cancer Cells

Surace, Claudio, Arpicco, Silvia, Dufaÿ-Wojcicki, Amélie, Marsaud, Véronique, Bouclier, Céline, Clay, Denis, Cattel, Luigi, Renoir, Jack-Michel, Fattal, Elias·2009·Molecular Pharmaceutics

Abstract

Lipoplexes containing a hyaluronic acid-dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (HA-DOPE) conjugate were designed to target the CD44 receptor on breast cancer cells. Cationic liposomes composed of a mixture of [2-(2,3-didodecyloxypropyl)hydroxyethyl]ammonium bromide (DE) and dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) with or without HA-DOPE were prepared, characterized, and used to form a complex with plasmid DNA pCMV-luc. Lipoplexes displayed a negative zeta potential and a mean diameter between 250-300 nm. Cytotoxicity and transfection efficiency of the lipoplexes were determined on the MDA-MB-231and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. Cytotoxicity was not modified by the presence of HA-DOPE. However HA-DOPE increased the level of transfection on CD44-expressing MDA-MB-231 cells compared to the MCF-7 line, which expresses very low levels of CD44. The transfection on the MDA-MB-231 cells was highly inhibited by anti-CD44 Hermes-1 antibody but not by the nonspecific anti-ErbB2 antibody. In conclusion, cationic liposomes containing the HA-DOPE conjugate mediated good transfection on CD44 expressing cell lines in culture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/mp800215d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Surace, C., Arpicco, S., Dufaÿ-Wojcicki, A., Marsaud, V., Bouclier, C., Clay, D., Cattel, L., Renoir, J.-M., & Fattal, E.
Venue
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Published
2009-05-26
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
1062-1073
ISSN
  • 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-8392
OpenAlex
W2023389405
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.