The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Morphology–Conductivity Relationship of Single-Ion-Conducting Block Copolymer Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries
Open accessAbstract
A significant limitation of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries arises because most of the ionic current is carried by the anion, the ion that does not participate in energy-producing reactions. Single-ion-conducting block copolymer electrolytes, wherein all of the current is carried by the lithium cations, have the potential to dramatically improve battery performance. The relationship between ionic conductivity and morphology of single-ion-conducting poly(ethylene oxide)- b -polystyrenesulfonyllithium(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (PEO–PSLiTFSI) diblock copolymers was studied by small-angle X-ray scattering and ac impedance spectroscopy. At low temperatures, an ordered lamellar phase is obtained, and the “mobile” lithium ions are trapped in the form of ionic clusters in the glassy polystyrene-rich microphase. An increase in temperature results in a thermodynamic transition to a disordered phase. Above this transition temperature, the lithium ions are released from the clusters, and ionic conductivity increases by several orders of magnitude. This morphology–conductivity relationship is very different from all previously published data on published electrolytes. The ability to design electrolytes wherein most of the current is carried by the lithium ions, to sequester them in nonconducting domains and release them when necessary, has the potential to enable new strategies for controlling the charge–discharge characteristics of rechargeable lithium batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crystallization of a weakly segregated polyolefin diblock copolymer
Rangarajan, P., Register, R. A., Fetters, L. J., Bras, W., Naylor, S., & Ryan, A. J. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00118a022 · Cited by 126
Fluctuations, Order, and Disorder in Short Diblock Copolymers
Lee, S., Gillard, T. M., & Bates, F. S. (2013) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.14023 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Poly(ethylene oxide)-based electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries
Xue, Z., He, D., & Xie, X. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c5ta03471j · Cited by 2,302
Shin, D. W., Guiver, M. D., & Lee, Y. M. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00586 · Cited by 989
Promising Routes to a High Li+ Transference Number Electrolyte for Lithium Ion Batteries
Diederichsen, K. M., McShane, E. J., & McCloskey, B. D. (2017) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00792 · Cited by 874
The Compensation Effect in the Vogel–Tammann–Fulcher (VTF) Equation for Polymer-Based Electrolytes
Diederichsen, K. M., Buss, H. G., & McCloskey, B. D. (2017) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00423 · Cited by 386
A star-shaped single lithium-ion conducting copolymer by grafting a poss nanoparticle
Cao, P.-F., Wojnarowska, Z., Hong, T., Carroll, B., Li, B., Feng, H., Parsons, L., Wang, W., Lokitz, B. S., Cheng, S., et al. (2017) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.052 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Inceoglu, S., Rojas, A. A., Devaux, D., Chen, X. C., Stone, G. M., & Balsara, N. P.
- Venue
- ACS Macro Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-05-15
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 510-514
- ISSN
- 2161-1653 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2314778518
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphology–Conductivity Relationship of Single-Ion-Conducting Block Copolymer Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/mz5001948
- The paper
- Inceoglu, S., Rojas, A. A., Devaux, D., Chen, X. C., Stone, G. M., & Balsara, N. P. (2014). Morphology–Conductivity Relationship of Single-Ion-Conducting Block Copolymer Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries. ACS Macro Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/mz5001948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.