Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 582

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Organization of Metallic Nanoparticles Using Tobacco Mosaic Virus Templates

Dujardin, Erik, Peet, Charlie, Stubbs, Gerald, Culver, James N., Mann, Stephen·2003·Nano Letters

Abstract

Self-assembled cylindrical particles of wild type and recombinant tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) were used as organic templates for the controlled deposition and organization of Pt, Au, or Ag nanoparticles. Chemical reduction of [PtCl 6 ] 2- or [AuCl 4 ] - complexes at acidic pH gave rise to the specific decoration of the external surface of wild-type TMV rods with metallic nanoparticles less than 10 nm in size. In contrast, photochemical reduction of Ag(I) salts at pH 7 resulted in nucleation and constrained growth of discrete Ag nanoparticles aligned within the 4 nm-wide internal channel. The number of encapsulated nanoparticles increased when Ag benzoate rather than Ag nitrate was used due to reduced supersaturation associated with the lower Ag/benzoate redox couple, which enhanced the surface-templating effect of the channel wall carboxylates compared with nucleation in solution. Similar experiments using a mutant TMV with reduced negative charge along the central cavity confirmed that glutamic and aspartate acid groups were involved in site-specific deposition. Our results suggest that it should be possible to prepare 1-D arrays for a wide range of inorganic quantum dots by molecular engineering of the internal and external surfaces of self-assembled TMV tubules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl034004o

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dujardin, E., Peet, C., Stubbs, G., Culver, J. N., & Mann, S.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2003-02-12
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
413-417
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2056597939
Cited by
582
References
0
FWCI
22.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.